The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the appellant's application to withdraw the civil appeal due to receipt of the decretal amount. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications.
Permission for withdrawal of the appeal was granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:36872]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 130/2013
Takhat Raj S/o Kanhaiyalal, by Caste Soni, aged about 43 years, resident of Balunda, Tehsil-Jaitaran, District Pali.
----Appellant
Versus
Manak Chand S/o Shri Jetharam, by Caste Kumawat, resident of Sangwas Bera Bhatayat, Tehsil-Jaitaran, District Pali.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. J.K. Bhaiya |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. R.S. Choudhary |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Judgment
01/11/2023
(REKHA BORANA),J
163-KashishS/-
Takhat Raj S/o Kanhaiyalal
Manak Chand S/o Shri Jetharam
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
