The High Court at Jaipur, Rajasthan, dismissed the contempt petition as the sole respondent-contemnor had died, rendering the petition infructuous.
Contempt petition disposed of as infructuous due to death of the sole respondent-contemnor.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:35798]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 62/2021
Anil Kumar Bagda S/o Late Shri Jeevanlal Ji Bagda, Resident Of Bagda Bhawan Second, House No. 1808, Chowkdi Vishveshvarji, Choura Rasta, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Ramkishore S/o Shri Gopinath Ji, Proprietor Of Firm M/s Kishore Traders, Shop No. 334, Bagda Bhawan First, Chowkdi Vishveshvarji, Choura Rasta, Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwardhan Tolani, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
23/11/2023
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that although the order dated 07.08.2019 of which contempt is alleged, has been complied with but sole respondent-contemnor-Ramkishore has also died. Thus, the contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.
Notices stand discharged.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /134
Anil Kumar Bagda
Ramkishore
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
