Ram Prakash and Others v. Shri Hari Singh Meena
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed the contempt petition as infructuous.
Court dismissed the contempt petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 397/2018
IN
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3031//2013
----Petitioners
Versus
Shri Hari Singh Meena Branch Manager the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Ganesh Bhawan Kachhari Road Ajmer (Raj.)
----Respondent/Contemnor
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. |
Neetu Bhansali for |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Amit Jindal | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Praveen Kumar Jain |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
24/04/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this contempt petition is rendered infructuous.
The same is dismissed accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
PRAGATI/6
Ram Prakash S/o Ganpat Lal Khandelwal, Neema D/o Ram Prakash Khandelwal, Nitin S/o Ram Prakash Khandelwal
Shri Hari Singh Meena
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court