High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a contempt petition alleging violation of an order dated 11.09.2017, ruling it infructuous as the respondents had complied with the prior order. Notices were discharged.
Contempt petition disposed of as infructuous; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:34508]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 27/2018
in
SB Civil Writ Petition No. 15517/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Raghav, AAG Ms. Archana on behalf of Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
(2 of 2)
[2023:RJ-JP:34508]
[CCP-27/2018]
Order
09/11/2023
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that respondents have decided the representation filed by the petitioner. Thus the order dated 11.09.2017, of which contempt is alleged, has been complied with. Hence, the contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.
Notices stand discharged.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Ritu/132
Bhupendra Singh Solanki and others
Shri Naveen Mahajan and others
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
