The High Court at Jodhpur dismissed a review petition challenging an order that directed the State to consider the respondent's representation based on a specific judgment, finding no error apparent as rights were not previously decided.
Review petition dismissed as no error was found apparent on the face of the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 88/2021
Versus
Indra Chand Lamord S/o Gordhan Lal, Aged about 66 years, Resident of Village And Post – Jayal, District Nagaur.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. |
Anjana Jawa |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : |
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
02/12/2022
(2 of 2)
[WRW-88/2021]
petition, this Court has not given any finding about the present respondent’s case being covered by the judgments relied upon and has only directed the present petitioners to consider respondent's representation in terms of the judgment rendered in the case of Sohan Lal (supra).
(DINESH MEHTA),J
Cuppl.(3)/Arvind-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any error apparent on the face of the record exists in an order directing petitioners to consider respondent's representation in light of Sohanlal Mathur judgment.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Referred¶2
Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008, decided on 17.11.2008, affirmed in SLP (Civil)No.14932/2012
The State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Public Health and Engineering
Indra Chand Lamord
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
