This single-judge order rectified a typographical error in a previously disposed Writ Petition, correcting the respondent number from 4 to 5 and directing the amendment to be uploaded.
Amended order of 10.01.2022 to be uploaded replacing respondent No.4 with respondent No.5; earlier order to be offloaded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Misc Application No. 26/2022
(2 of 3) [WMAP-26/2022]
Udaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order
05/02/2022
(3 of 3)
[WMAP-26/2022]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
m-53-ArunV/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an order affected by a typographical error regarding respondent number requires rectification.
Whether the correct respondent number should replace the erroneous citation in the operative order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
SB Civil Writ Petition No.319/2022Referred¶32
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V/K, S.B. (Set of 14)
Union Of India
Serious Fraud Investigation Office
State Of Rajasthan (Through SP, SOG & ATS)
Registrar, Rajasthan Co-Operative Societies
Aadarsh Credit Cooperative Society Limited (Multi-State)
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
