Allowed

Ramsingh Son of Shri Kishan Singhal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Mar 2022SOSR/44/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Uma Shanker Vyas, without commenting on merit, suspended the sentence of the petitioners who was confined in custody during pendency of his criminal appeal and directed his release on bail providing personal bond of 1,00,000/-.

What did the court decide?

Sentence awarded to applicant is suspended and applicant is released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/each.

Ramsingh Son of Shri Kishan Singhal Vs State of… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail (Suspension of Sentence) Application No.44/2022

¶3

¶4

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 259/2022

¶5

Ramsingh Son of Shri Kishan Singhal, Resident Of Jaitpura, Tehsil And Thana Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) (Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Sawaimadhopur)

¶6

----Accused-Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Meenakshi Pareek, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

04/03/2022

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for accused-applicant submits that the applicant was on bail during trial as well as during appeal and he is presently confined in judicial custody. Learned counsel further submits that final hearing of the petition is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶17

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[SOSR-44/2022]

¶20

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court and affirmed by the learned appellate Court against the accused-applicant namely, Ramsingh S/o Shri Kishan Singhal in Criminal Case No.78/2009 shall remain suspended during pendency of petition and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 05^th April, 2022 and as when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /38

Ramsingh Son of Shri Kishan Singhal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramsingh Son of Shri Kishan Singhal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Gurjar S/O Shri Babulal B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas Vs Fateh Chand and Ors.

Manohar Singh Chahar S/O Jaalim Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Girdhari Lal Yogi Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Navratan Parashar Son of Shri Ashok Kumar Parashar Vs Kailash Nagauri @ Binni Son of Shri Murlidhar Sharma @ Ladduram

Karan Sen Son of Madan Lal Sen Vs State of Rajasthan