Allowed

Mukesh Kumar S/O Ramswaroop v. Rajasthan State

Rajasthan HC24 Jan 2022SOSR/19/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a suspension of sentence application, granting bail to the accused-appellant conditioned upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

What did the court decide?

Sentence remains suspended during pendency of petition; applicant released on bail with personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Mukesh Kumar S/O Ramswaroop Vs Rajasthan State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

¶3

No.19/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 107/2022

¶6

Mukesh Kumar S/o Ramswaroop, R/o Nag Labni, P.s. Thanagazi, District Alwar Rajasthan (At Present Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

Rajasthan State, Through Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Chander Sharma, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Yadav, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

24/01/2022

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶16

Learned counsel for accused-applicant submits that the applicant is presently in judicial custody. Learned counsel further submits final hearing of the petition is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-appellant may be suspended.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

SOSR19/2022

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶20

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶21

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶22

Accordingly, the application for suspension of

¶23

sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial court and affirmed by the learned appellate court against the accused-appellant/s namely, Mukesh Kumar S/o Ramswaroop in Criminal Case No.1019/12 shall remain suspended during pendency of petition and he be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 25^th February, 2022 and as and when called upon to do so.

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

CHHAYA AWASTHI /38

Mukesh Kumar S/O Ramswaroop v. Rajasthan State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar S/O Ramswaroop v. Rajasthan State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manisha Devi W/O Shri Baldev Yadav D/O Vijay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Prasad S/O Shri Bhonrilal B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajendra Prasad Son of Shri Bhonrilal by Caste Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Taalim Son of Salim Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan

Rekhraj S/O Gulab Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganga Devi W/O Ghanshyam Vs State of Rajasthan