Application for interim bail was rejected. The High Court observed the appellant was a hardened criminal involved in nine cases with two escape incidents, deeming bail an indulgence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 36/2022
Saddam S/o Sh. Ghisu Khan, Aged About 31 Years, B/c Chamariya Khera, Bagore, Dist. Bhilwara (Raj.). (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Ajmer).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.R. Bhati (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
18/01/2022
The appellant seeks interim bail on the ground of death of
his father.
A perusal of the antecedent report submitted on record indicates that the appellant is a hardened criminal and is involved in not less than nine cases. He has also twice, escaped from the prison.
In this background, we are not inclined to extend indulgence of interim bail to the appellant. Hence, the application for interim bail is rejected as being devoid of merit.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
100-Sudhir Asopa/Devesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim bail can be extended in light of the appellant being a hardened criminal with multiple pending cases and escape history.
Saddam S/o Sh. Ghisu Khan
State Of Rajasthan
Sandeep Mehta
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
