Allowed

Smt. Narbada W/O Badrilal Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC28 Mar 2022SOSA/279/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suspended the sentence awarded to two accused-appellants during the pendency of their appeal. Granted bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each, though merits of the case were not commented upon.

What did the court decide?

Suspended sentence and released accused on personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Smt. Narbada W/O Badrilal Jat Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

¶2

BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.279/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 414/2022

¶6

Smt. Narbada W/o Badrilal Jat, Resident Of Dabla P.S. Uniyara, District Tonk (Raj.)

¶7

Badrilal S/o Ram Narayan Jat, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of Dabla, P.S. Uniyara, District Tonk (Raj.)

¶8

----Accused-Appellants

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhadia, P.P.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶14

Order

¶15

28/03/2022

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶17

Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that accused-applicants were on bail during trial and their sentence has already been suspended by the learned trial Court. He further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicants may be suspended.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶19

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[SOSA-279/2022]

¶22

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicants.

¶23

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicants namely, 1. Smt. Narbada W/o Badrilal Jat & 2. Badrilal S/o Ram Narayan Jat in Sessions Case No.30/2015 (45/2015) shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this court on 29^th April, 2022 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶24

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶25

DANISH USMANI /49

Smt. Narbada W/O Badrilal Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Narbada W/O Badrilal Jat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Irfaan Hussain S/O Altaf Hussain B/C Musalman Vs Nikhat W/O Irfaan Hussain D/O Shri Abdul Rashid B/C Muslim Rangrej

Vinod Sharma @ Pandit S/O Shri Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjesh Ali S/O Kamrudeen Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Bega Ram S/O Shri Pema Ram B/C Balai Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Laxman Son of Ramkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Son of Dayaram Vs State of Rajasthan