Allowed

Rajju Lal Meena Son of Late Kamal Lal Meena v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Rajasthan HC22 Mar 2022SOSA/262/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for suspension of sentence, the High Court, without commenting on the merits, allowed the prayer for suspension of sentence appeal and bail for the accused-appellant.

What did the court decide?

Suspension of sentence and bail granted; release on bail subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs.50,000 each with a stipulation to appear.

Rajju Lal Meena Son of Late Kamal Lal Meena Vs Central… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

¶3

No.262/2022

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 371/2022

¶6

Rajju Lal Meena Son of Late Shri Kamal Lal Meena, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of CPWD General Pool, Quarter No. 140, Type Second Block 18, Sector 3, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur The Then U.D.C. The Office Of Regional Labour Commissioner (Central) Kendriya Sadan, Block 1, Third Floor, A-C/3-7, Sector 10, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶7

----Accused-Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

Central Bureau Of Investigation, Through P.P.

¶10

	----Respondent
For Appellant(s)	: Mr. Anil Kumar Upman, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Ashwini Kumar Sharma, Spl. P.P., through VC

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

22/03/2022

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application filed for suspension of sentence and perused the entire material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that at present accused-applicant is behind bars. He further submits that final hearing of the appeal is likely to take time thus sentence of the accused-applicant may be suspended.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer regarding suspension of sentence.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[SOSA-262/2022]

¶19

I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel

¶20

for the parties.

¶21

Without commenting upon the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to suspend the sentence awarded to the applicant.

¶22

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded by the learned trial Court to the accused-applicant namely, Rajju Lal Meena S/o Late Shri Kamal Lal Meena in Sessions Case No.16/2018 shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal and he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this court on 25^th April, 2022 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

DANISH USMANI /81

Rajju Lal Meena Son of Late Kamal Lal Meena v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajju Lal Meena Son of Late Kamal Lal Meena v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Sharma Son of Shri Sitaram Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Satyanarayan S/O Ladhulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi Saraswat S/O Gopal Prasad B/C Brahimin Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu Kumar Meena S/O Shri Parmandand Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Son of Rewarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ghasiram Sani S/O Late Shri Bajran Lal B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan