Appeal against impugned order admitting appellant as doctor was dismissed as withdrawn. Court noted appellant failed to file appointment agreement below, granting liberty to file review.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 659/2022
In
S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3819/2021
Dr. Gogalal Jat S/o Shri Rodulal Jat, Aged About 61 Years, Resident of Village Selsagar (Pachewar), Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Ayush Doctor, Primary Health Center, Panwaliya, Block Todaraisingh, District Tonk.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura Advocate.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
25/05/2022
Heard.
We find that before the learned Single Judge, the appellant claimed relief without filing the agreement, which followed his appointment. In the absence of the same being placed before the learned Single Judge, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge.
(2 of 2)
[SAW-659/2022]
At this stage, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal with liberty to the appellant to file review petition by placing before the learned Single Judge the agreement which followed the order of appointment of the appellant.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
MANOJ NARWANI /3
Dr. Gogalal Jat
State of Rajasthan
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
