The court dismissed the habeas corpus petition as infructuous after the petitioners sought the recovery of individuals who were subsequently produced before the Court. The produced individuals stated they were adults and had left of their own free will.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 32/2022
Shyam @ Shyamo Son Of Sh. Udham, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Palla, Tehsil Kaman, Bharatpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Assistant Govt. Advocate Investigating Officer : Mr. Mohan Singh, ASI, PS Kaman, District Bharatpur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
(2 of 2)
[HC-32/2022]
22/02/2022
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
HEENA/03
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for habeas corpus is maintainable when the alleged detainees have been produced before the Court.
Shyam @ Shyamo
State Of Rajasthan
The Director General Of Police
The Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur
Sugan S/o Kamal
Niranjan S/o Jairam
Pankaj Bhandari
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
