Sumrat Son of Dhanmat v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Habeas Corpus petition, the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petitioner's claim as infructuous because the person in question had returned to the petitioner.
In this Habeas Corpus petition, the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petitioner's claim as infructuous because the person in question had returned to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 293/2022
Sumrat Son Of Dhanmat, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Satwari, Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For State : Mr. Rajendra Yadav GA-cum-AAG with Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Assistant Govt. Adv.
(2 of 2)
[HC-293/2022]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
12/10/2022
Counsel for the petitioner states that the present Habeas Corpus Petition has become infructuous as the corpus has returned to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the present Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed
as having become infructuous.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/70
Sumrat Son Of Dhanmat
State Of Rajasthan
Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit
Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur
Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur
Station House Officer, Police Station Pahari
PANKAJ BHANDARI
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court