Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8931/2016
Rajendra Kumar Jatolia, S/o Puranmal Jatolia, aged 25 years, R/o Sewad Badi, Via Phagalwa, Dist. Sikar
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek B. Sharma (through VC) For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.D. Rastogi, ASG (through VC)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
08/02/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the present writ petition.
The opposite side has no objection to the same.
In the light of above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
All pending applications stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Arun/26
Rajendra Kumar Jatolia
Indian Institute of Technology, Madras
Rajasthan College of Engineering for Women
SAMEER JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
