This order made absolute an interim stay on a transfer order challenging a state employee's service transfer due to change in circumstances, though the respondent remains free to pass a fresh order.
Impugned transfer order will not be given effect to. Respondents free to pass fresh order if exigency warrants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 818/2019
Rajbala W/o Shri Rajkumar, Aged About 35 Years, Resident of Village Bas Chanani, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent. |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
20/07/2022
(2 of 2)
[CW-818/2019]
and passage of sufficiently long time, the expediency must have withered away or ceased to exist by now.
(REKHA BORANA),J
57-Sachin/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim stay on the impugned transfer order must be made absolute despite administrative changes.
Rajbala W/o Shri Rajkumar
State of Rajasthan Through The Secretary Department of Medical And Health
Additional Director Administration Medical And Health Services
Chief Medical And Health Officer Ratangarh
Block Chief Medical And Health Officer Ratangarh
Chief Executive Officer Jila Parishad Churu
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
