letter dated 29:10.2013. petitioner filed a representation dated 26.12.2013 but he was still not allowed to join and therefore, OA No.18/2014 was filed before the learned CAT. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not allowed to join services due to pendency of one criminal case, registered against him. However, the petitioner had filed Attestation Form dated 06.11.201.3 and in that form, the petitioner had categorically declared that one FIR No.47/2008 under Section 323, 341 of IPC was filed against him of which the trial is going on. Learned counsel for the respondent, at this juncture, submitted that during enquiry, it was discovered that the petitioner had del'iberately concealed the vital fact that th:e;ca'se registered against him was not just for Section 323, 341 of IPC, but also for Section 325 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petiti0ne.r submitted that column 12 in the Attestation. Form pertained to the question whether "any case pending against you in any court of law at the time of filing this attestation form" and the petitioner had specifically answered it in positive,vi;di~~~~~~~~et~lsf ).,(. "~sz.Cr..,L7xP8 ',%,;,-$ FIR number along with 1 $$.' rhd& J ,. %$. Y"?i-=%q,.f,lp Jy.,*+ .: r other necessary detail;;.'~'e ~$b-~itsithap-it has only on account of inadvertent error and lack of knowledge that Section 325 was not 1 mentioned, so there is no reason to believe that there was I concealment. In light of above, learned counsel far the petitioner has prayed that his petition may be allowed, especially considering the fact that the petitioner was acquitted.
