Allowed

Pradeep Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Dec 2022CW/5867/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought service regularization prior to a Coordinate Bench decision. The single-judge bench disposed of both writ petitions by following the directions of a Coordinate Bench in Jitendra Kumar Tailor, directing the State to decide the matter within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were disposed of with directions to the State Government to decide the matter of regularization of services within four weeks.

Pradeep Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5867/2022

¶3

Pradeep Kumar S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Kacchi Thedi, Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Director, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Municipal Board Sri Karanpur, Through Its Executive Officer/chairman, Sri Karanpur District Sri Ganganagar

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5727/2022

¶12

Raju Ram S/o Shri Gurbachan Ram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 4, 17 Ob, 15 O, Sri Ganganagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶16

The Director, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶17

The Municipal Board Sri Karanpur, Through Its Executive Officer/chairman, Sri Karanpur District Sri Ganganagar

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J. S. Bhaleria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Parihar

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CW-5867/2022]

¶22

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶23

Order

¶24

16/12/2022

¶25

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue raised by the petitioners in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.

¶26

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

¶27

“In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner’s services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order.”

¶28

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶29

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are disposed of, in light of and with similar directions as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

¶30

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶31

169 & 170-A.Arora/-

Pradeep Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Savita Vs State of Rajasthan

Khemraj Garg @ Khimraj Garg Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Shishupal Verma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Raju Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Suhani Gandhi Vs State of Rajasthan