Disposed

Ranjeet Bairwa S/O Hanuman Lal Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 May 2022CW/4563/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench disposed of PIL seeking removal of encroachments. Directed petitioner to submit representation to created Public Land Protection Cell for disposal within two months and mandated opportunity of hearing for alleged encroachers.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed. Petitioner directed to submit representation to PLPC for disposal within two months. Encroachers to be given hearing opportunity.

Ranjeet Bairwa S/O Hanuman Lal Bairwa Vs… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

D.B. Civil Public Interest Litigation No. 4563/2022

¶3

Ranjeet Bairwa S/o Hanuman Lal Bairwa, R/o 21, Bairwa Indra Colony, Village Reta, Post Rasile, Vaya Dudu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

District Collector And Permanent Chairman, PLPC, Jaipur.

¶9

Sub Divisional Magistrate, S.D.O. Office, Dudu, Jaipur.

¶10

Tehsildar, Tehsil Mauzamabad, District Jaipur.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Ratnawat, Adv.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶14

Order

¶15

09/05/2022

¶16

Instant Public Interest Litigation petition has been filed with

¶17

the following prayer:-

¶18

“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordships may pleased to accept and allow the Public Interest Litigation and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:-

¶19

i) The respondents may kindly be directed to immediately take appropriate action in the matter and remove all the encorachments for the Charagah land situated in village/Gram Panchayat Rasili, Tehsil Mauzamabad, Distt Jaipur as well as from the land which is earmarked and kept reserved for public utility purposes, as per the revenue record

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CW-4563/2022]

¶22

ii) Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper may also be passed in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶23

A Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Jagdish

¶24

Prashad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/ 2018 vide order dated

¶25

30.01.2019 has directed creation of Public Land Protection Cell (PLPC) for rural areas in every district.

¶26

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to submit a representation before the PLPC and respondents be directed to dispose of the same within a period of two months.

¶27

In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed off, in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench in the matter of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra) and the petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before PLPC and the respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of two months.

¶28

It is further directed that in the inquiry for removal of encroachment, the persons, who are alleged to be encroachers, shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing.

¶29

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶30

(PRAKASH GUPTA),J

¶31

Pooja /31

Ranjeet Bairwa S/O Hanuman Lal Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Bairwa S/O Hanuman Lal Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shveta Devi W/O Shri Pappu Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan

Shyam Lal Sharma S/O Sh. Girraj Prasad Sharma Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Nahar Singh S/O Shri Narayan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-I Vs Shri Gaurav Bagaria

Rajesh Kumar Soni S/O Sh. Kesar Dev Soni Vs Income Tax Officer

Manmeet Kapoor S/O Sh G P S Kapoor Vs Income Tax Office