This is a listless order where the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed a D.B. Civil Writ Petition for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's counsel having no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4322/2002
M/s.Surya Cons.Co., P.W.D. Contractor, Bhinmal
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Kothari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kesar Singh Mr. Aditya Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
03/11/2022
Learned counsel Shri Kothari pleads no instructions. No one else is available to argue the matter on behalf of the petitioner.
Thus, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
4-/Devesh/-
M/s. Surya Cons. Co.
State of Rajasthan Through the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department
The Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer/CTO, Bhinmal
M/s. Mangla Ram
Asstt. Commissioner, Work & Leasing Tax, Churu
Sanjeev Mehta
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
