The Commissioner sought to be impleaded as a party respondent in a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a mining lease. The court held that the applicants were merely complainants and their rights would not be affected by the petition's outcome, dismissing the application.
Application for impleadment and stay disposed of by dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 412/2020
Ratna Ram
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Choudhary, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mrig Raj Singh For Applicant(s) : Mr. Dinesh Godara, through VC
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
05/01/2022
I.A. No.1/2020
[CW-412/2020]
(2 of 2)
(DINESH MEHTA),J
67-skm/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether applicants, who are complainants, can be impleaded as party respondents in a writ petition challenging the cancellation of the petitioner's mining lease.
Ratna Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Dinesh Godara
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
