The High Court dismissed multiple writ petitions as a coordinate Bench at Jaipur had already covered the controversy in a connected case, thus no separate reasons were recorded.
Writ petitions dismissed without separate reasons as covered in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8109/2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15361/2021
(2 of 5) [CW-15361/2021]
(3 of 5)
[CW-15361/2021]
----Petitioners
Versus
(4 of 5) [CW-15361/2021]
Connected With
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. V.D. Vaishnav, Associate to Mr. Hemant Ballani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajvendra Saraswat
(5 of 5)
[CW-15361/2021]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
05/12/2022
The controversy involved in these writ petitions is squarely covered by the judgment dated 27.09.2022 passed in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8109/2022 (Sudarshan Lal Gupta vs. Union of India & Ors.) and connected matters by a Coordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur.
Thus, without recording separate reasons, the writ petitions are also dismissed.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
43-Sudhir Asopa/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sudarshan Lal Gupta vs. Union of India & Ors.Followed¶87
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8109/2022 (Sudarshan Lal Gupta vs. Union of India & Ors.)
Jaisalmer Jila Khanij Paryavaran Sarakshan Sansthan
Union Of India
SANDEEP MEHTA
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
SANDEEP MEHTA and KULDEEP MATHUR
Parties & counsel
