Three writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous following the surge in COVID-19 cases and the spread of the Omicron variant, as advised to courts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2) [CW-3124/2013]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3124/2013
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
----Petitioner
Versus
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam, Ltd. Andors
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3126/2013
Shiv Narayan Sharma
----Petitioner
Versus
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam, Ltd. Andors
----Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3127/2013
Hari Singh
----Petitioner Versus
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam, Ltd. Andors
| ----Respondent | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Pankaj Gupta a/w Mr. AS Rathore on VC |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Dhanesh Saraswat on VC |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
01/02/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts.
(2 of 2)
[CW-3124/2013]
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petitions have become infructuous.
Consequently, the instant petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending applications also stand dismissed accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
66-68-Sudheer/-
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
Shiv Narayan Sharma
Hari Singh
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam, Ltd.
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
