Disposed

Sunita D/O Hari Karan W/O Hanuman v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Feb 2022CW/2605/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2605/2022 in terms of a connected matter, directing respondents to consider the petitioner's candidature for appointment as Health Worker (Female) based on prior resolution regarding qualification adequacy.

What did the court decide?

Directed to consider petitioner's candidature for appointment and accord appointment if suitable, otherwise according to merit position.

Sunita D/O Hari Karan W/O Hanuman Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2605/2022

¶3

Sunita D/o Hari Karan W/o Hanuman, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Sahwa, District Churu, Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶7

The Director (Non-Gazzeted), Medical And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Family Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Registrar, Rajasthan Nursing Counsil, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Rajasthan 302001

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir Khan for Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Dr. V.B. Sharma, AAG

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

¶13

Order

¶14

15/02/2022

¶15

Issue notice to the respondents.

¶16

Notices are accepted by Dr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General.

¶17

Service is complete.

¶18

Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the issue involved in this writ petition as to her entitlement for appointment on the post of Health Worker (Female) on the strength of Adeeb qualification from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh is no more res integra and stands resolved vide judgment dated

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CW-2605/2022]

¶21

10.02.2022 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1457/2021: Jahida Saima Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and other connected matters and pray that this writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms.

¶22

In case of Jahida Saima (supra), this Court has held as under:

¶23

“In view of the above, the writ petitions deserve to be allowed.

¶24

The writ petitions are allowed accordingly. The respondents are directed to consider candidature of the petitioners for appointment on the post of Health Worker (Female) and to accord them appointment if found suitable otherwise as per their respective merit position with all consequential benefits from the date persons less meritorious were given appointment barring actual monetary benefits.”

¶25

Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsels for the respective parties, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms as directed by this Court in case of Jahida Saima (supra) which shall apply mutatis mutandis to this case also.

¶26

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶27

PRAGATI/152

Sunita D/O Hari Karan W/O Hanuman v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita D/O Hari Karan W/O Hanuman v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sulochna Suman D/O Shri Mahaveer Suman Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishnu Dutt Sharma Son of Shri Ram Manohar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramdhan S/O Kalyan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Meena D/O Kishan Lal Meena Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kusum Lata D/O Satyanarayan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sonika and Ors. Vs State Medical and Healthors