This Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of the Bar Council of Rajasthan's Disciplinary Committee, holding that a statutory appeal lies under the Advocates Act, making the writ remedy inapplicable.
The writ petition and the stay application were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2397/2022
Suresh Das Vaishnav S/o Sh. Nanda Das, Aged About 44 Years, Advocate, Resident Of Billiya Kalla, Post Kharabad, Tehsil Hamirgarh, District Bhilwara (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghvendra Mundel
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
15/02/2022
(2 of 2)
[CW-2397/2022]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
33-A.Arora/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition challenging the Disciplinary Committee's order is maintainable in this Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh Das Vaishnav
Prabhulal
Dev Raj Singh
Teju Vaishnav
Bar Council Of Rajasthan
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
