Dismissed

Sanatan Dharm College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

Rajasthan HC3 Feb 2022CW/1859/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Writ Petition sought direction for NCTE to decide pending course recognition applications. Court accepted respondent counsel's assurance of proposed processing timelines and disposed of the petition by directing the Western Regional Committee to consider the petitioner's application on fulfilling specified documentary conditions.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Western Regional Committee to consider petitioner's application for recognition by fulfilling specified conditions, preferably before 30.04.2022.

Sanatan Dharm College of Education Vs National… — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1859/2022

¶3

Sanatan Dharm College Of Education, Rawla Road, Khajuwala, Bikaner Running By Swami Dayanand Shikshan Avam Vikas Sansthan Through Its Secretary Daleep Kumar Delu S/o Bhoop Ram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Rawla Road, Khajuwala, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

National Council For Teacher Education, New Delhi, Though Its Chairperson, Hans Bhawan, Wing II, 1, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi.

¶7

The Western Regional Committee, National Council For Teachers Education, Through Its Under Secretary, Plot No. G-7, Sector-10, Near National Highway Authority, Dwarka, New Delhi.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Ms.	Swati Shekhar through V.C.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Vivek Shrimali through V.C.

¶10

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

03/02/2022

¶13

By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has raised a grievance that it had filed application for recognition of CoursesB.A.B.Ed./B.Sc.B.Ed., B.S.T.C., B.P.Ed, M.Ed., S.T.C., B.Ed, B.A.B.Sc.B.Ed., however, the same has not been decided and is pending consideration before the Western Regional Committee.

¶14

Mr. Vivek Shrimali, learned counsel appearing for NCTE, on the other hand, submits that maybe the petitioner’s assertions are correct that it has filed application, however, since the application was filed many years ago, the NCTE is not having

¶15

(2 of 3)

¶16

[CW-1859/2022]

¶17

particulars/whereabouts of the said application which is allegedly pending.

¶18

He further submits that NCTE has taken an in principle decision to process all the applications for recognition subject, of course, to the following conditions-

¶19

“ 1. Affidavit on Rs.100 stamp paper from the President/Secretary of the Management duly notarized giving the details of applications pending with NCTE and also the existing courses being run by the management on the same land where this application is proposed, as per format approved by WRC.

¶20

To submit the proof of submission of initial application to NRC in original, self-attested.

¶21

To submit the proof of rejection of initial application by NRC in original, duly self-attested.

¶22

To submit the proof of payment of processing fee at the time of initial application, self-attested (photocopy of DO/ Bank Statement/ Certificate from Bank etc).”

¶23

Mr. Shrimali, learned counsel for the NCTE assures that on fulfilling the aforesaid conditions, the petitioner’s application shall be processed by the NCTE, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of fulfilling all the formalities and conditions.

¶24

Considering the assurance given by learned counsel for the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Western Regional Committee/competent authority to consider

¶25

(3 of 3)

¶26

[CW-1859/2022]

¶27

petitioner’s application for grant of recognition on fulfilling the condition mentioned in para (3) above, in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably before 30.04.2022.

¶28

The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶29

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶30

29-Ramesh/-

Sanatan Dharm College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanatan Dharm College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Geeta Devi Sharma Vs Union of India

Krishna Garg Vs State of Rajasthan

Jai Brahmani Construction Company Vs State of Rajasthan

Dau Ram Vs Union of India

Bhanwar Puri Vs State of Rajasthan

Shree National Public Shikshan Sansthan Vs National Council for Teacher Education