The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to deposit peremptory costs imposed in earlier orders regarding a land allotment for a government Mahavidyalaya.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
[CW-16223/2022]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.16223/2022
Samadari Mahavidyalaya Bhumi Sangrash Samiti, Samdari, Barmer through its Secreatary Tikam Singh Rajpurohit S/o Basti Singh Rajpurohit aged about 51 Years, R/o Village and Post Parlu, Silor, District Barmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
| ----Respondents | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : | No | nepresent | |
| For Respondent(s) | : | - |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
13/12/2022
The petitioner has failed to deposit per-emptory cost in terms of the order dated 01.11.2022 and thereafter reiterated on 14.11.2022. The writ petition has been filed for challenging the order dated 28.10.2021 whereby the land has been allotted for
(2 of 2)
[CW-16223/2022]
the purpose of construction of Building of Government Mahavidyalaya Samdari, Barmer (Raj.).
Registry shall keep a note of the subject matter of this writ petition and in case a fresh writ petition on the same issue is filed by another party, thus orders shall be brought to the notice of the Court.
Copy of this order shall be provided to Shri Sunil Beniwal, AAG.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J
26-Ravi Kh/-
Samadari Mahavidyalaya Bhumi Sangrash Samiti through its Secretary Tikam Singh Rajpurohit
State of Rajasthan
SANDEEP MEHTA
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
