Writ petition filed by four petitioners against State authorities regarding grievances was disposed of as infructuous after respondent counsel stated that all grievances were ventilated, with petitioner counsel not disputing this submission.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11637/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[CW-11637/2022]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Inani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Sharma, AAG Mr. Rishi Soni
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
09/09/2022
This Court is informed by Shri Pankaj Sharma, learned AAG that all the grievances raised by the petitioners in this writ petition have been ventilated.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to dispute the above submission.
Thus, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
53-Ravi Kh/-
Mangilal Darji
Rajkumar
Raju Das
Madha Ram
State Of Rajasthan And Others
Sandeep Mehta
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
