Dismissed

Kailash v. Vijayraj

Rajasthan HC1 Apr 2022CTA/105/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this transfer application, the petitioner sought to shift the place of service of the insurer respondent from the branch to its corporate office to facilitate suit filing. The court rejected the request, upholding the decree based on the original High Court findings regarding the insurance branch's jurisdiction.

What did the court decide?

No shift of place of service from Insurance Branch to Head Office permitted; High Court order affirmed.

Kailash Vs Vijayraj — Insurance | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Transfer Appl. No. 105/2021

¶4

Kailash S/o Bhanwara Ram, Aged About 21 Years, Shubhdand, Tehsil Luni, Dis. Jodhpur

¶5

Prakash S/o Hadmanram, Aged About 25 Years, Village Dhana, Jhanwar, District Jodhpur

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

Vijayraj S/o Manaram, Aged About 48 Years, Bhawani Pura, Dhundhara, District Jodhpur

¶9

I.c.i.c.i. Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd, 3Rd Floor, Complex, Sardarpura, Udaipur. At Present 1St Floor, (Rear Portion), Plot No. 115/3, Solitaire Building, Sps Road, P.w.d. Colony, Jodhpur

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)

¶12

: Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh Balot : Mr. Jagdish Vyas Mr. Mahesh Chandra Bishnoi

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶14

Judgment

¶15

Reserved on 30/03/2022 Pronounced on 01/04/2022

¶16

01/kkjk 24 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g izkFkZuk&i= ;kph&vizkFkhZx.k us eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] ikyh ds le{k yafcr ,e-,-lh-Vh- Dyse izdj.k la[;k 63@2021 fot;jkt cuke dSyk'k vkfn dks eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] ikyh ls eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] tks/kiqj esa varfjr fd, tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;kA

¶17

02eSaus i{kdkjku~ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl lquh ,oa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶18

03;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph&vizkFkhZx.k dSyk'k o izdk'k ¼Øe'k% okgu pkyd o okgu Lokeh½ us ;g rdZ fn;k fd v;kph&izkFkhZ fot;jkt us ,e-,-lh-Vh- Dyse]

¶19

(2 of 4)

¶20

[CTA-105/2021]

¶21

eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] ikyh esa vizkFkhZx.k dSyk'k] izdk'k o chek dEiuh ds fo#) izLrqr fd;k gSA nkafMd izdj.k esa vUos"k.k ds ckn vkjksi&i= vfrfjDr eq[; egkuxj eftLVªsV la[;k&04] tks/kiqj egkuxj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA Dyse izkFkZuk&i= ds vuqlkj izkFkhZ fot;jkt xkao /kqU/kkM+k] ftyk tks/kiqj dk LFkkbZ fuoklh gSA nq?kZVuk Hkh Hkokuhiqjk /kqU/kkM+k ftyk tks/kiqj esa ?kfVr gqbZ gSA gLrxr ;kfpdk ds v;kph&DysesaV ij rkehy Hkh tks/kiqj ds irs ij gh gqbZ gSA izdj.k ds lHkh lk{khx.k ftyk tks/kiqj ds fuoklh gSaA v;kph&DysesaV dk ikyh esa fuokl djus ;k O;kikj djus dk dksbZ nLrkost is'k ugha fd;k x;k gSA mYya?kudkjh okgu dk pkyd o Lokeh tks/kiqj ds jgus okys gSaA vfrfjDr eq[; egkuxj eftLVªsV la[;k&04] tks/kiqj egkuxj esa DysesaV fot;jkt us odkyrukek izLrqr fd;k gS] ftlesa Hkh mlus viuk irk tks/kiqj dk vafdr fd;k gSA nkafMd U;k;ky; }kjk lEeu Hkh jsyos LVs'ku Hkokuhiqjk] yw.kh dk tkjh gqvk gS] tks ml ij rkehy gqvk gSA DysesaV us Dyse izkFkZuk&i= tkucw>dj vizkFkhZx.k okgu pkyd o okgu Lokeh dks rax o ijs'kku djus ds fy, ikyh esa izLrqr fd;k gSA vr% bu ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] ikyh ds le{k yafcr iz'uxr Dyse izdj.k dks eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] tks/kiqj egkuxj esa varfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA mUgksaus vius bu rdksZa dh iqf"V esa fuEufyf[kr uthjsa is'k dh] ftudk eSaus voyksdu fd;k %&

¶22

2021 (2) DNJ (SC) 655 Ravinder Nath Agarwal Versus Yogender Nath Agarwal & Ors.

¶23

2022 (1) DNJ (SC) 61 Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society Versus Vidyasagar

¶24

04v;kph&DysesaV&izkFkhZ ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk us mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;k vkSj ;g rdZ fn;k fd eq[; dUVsfLVax ikVhZ chek dEiuh gS] ftldh laifÙk o dk;kZy; ikyh esa Hkh fLFkr gSA DysesaV&izkFkhZ us vius iqfyl c;kuksa esa ikyh esa ydM+h dk dke djuk crk;k gSA DysesaV&izkFkhZ ikyh esa O;olk; o fuokl djrk gSA mYya?kudkjh okgu ds pkyd o Lokeh dks ,e-,-lh-Vh- izdj.k esa lkekU;r% vf/kdj.k ds le{k mifLFkr gksus dh dksbZ vko';drk ugha gksrh gSA lk/kkj.kr;k% ,d ckj] vko';drk gksus ij] c;ku nsus ds fy, vf/kdj.k ds le{k

¶25

(3 of 4)

¶26

[CTA-105/2021]

¶27

mifLFkfr visf{kr gSA /kkjk 166 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds rgr Dyse izkFkZuk&i= dh lquokbZ dh vf/kdkfjrk ikyh fLFkr vf/kdj.k dks izkIr gSA blfy, varj.k izkFkZuk&i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA mUgksaus vius bu rdksZa dh iqf"V esa fuEufyf[kr uthjsa is'k dh] ftudk eSaus voyksdu fd;k %&

¶28

2014 (2) DNJ (RAJ.) 811 Khandokar Afia Sultana & Ors. Versus P.O., MACT, Ajmer & Ors.

¶29

2016 ACJ 542 Malati Sardar Versus National Insurance Co. Ltd.

¶30

and others.

¶31

05eSaus mi;qZDr ijLij fojks/kh rdksZa ij fopkj fd;kA izkFkhZ&DysesaV fot;jkt us vuqyXud&1 Dyse izkFkZuk&i= eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] ikyh ds le{k izLrqr fd;k gS] ftlesa mlus viuk gky fuokl LFkku vkuUn uxj] ikyh vafdr fd;k gSA iSjk la[;k 04 esa ydM+h ,oa QuhZpj dk dkjhxj gksuk vafdr fd;k gSA bl U;k;ky; esa izLrqr odkyrukek esa DysesaV&izkFkhZ us gky fuoklh vkuUn uxj] ikyh gksuk vafdr fd;k gSA bl izdkj DysesaV&izkFkhZ dk orZeku fuokl LFkku vkuUn uxj] ikyh esa gksuk nf"Vxr gksrk gSA vizkFkhZ la[;k 03 chek dEiuh dk dk;kZy; Hkh ikyh esa fLFkr gksuk crk;k gSA /kkjk 166 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds rgr ikyh esa fLFkr vf/kdj.k dks DysesaV&izkFkhZ dh Dyse ;kfpdk dh lquokbZ dh vf/kdkfjrk izkIr gksuk nf"Vxr gksrk gSA

¶32

06vfHkys[k ls ;g izdV gksrk gS fd DysesaV&izkFkhZ LFkkbZ :i ls /kqU/kkM+k] ftyk tks/kiqj dk fuoklh gS] ysfdu DysesaV&izkFkhZ ds vuqlkj orZeku esa og ikyh esa fuokl djrk gSA ikyh esa chek dEiuh dh lEifRr@dk;kZy; fLFkr gksuk crk;k x;k gSA Dyse izkFkZuk i= esa okgu pkyd o okgu Lokeh vo'; tks/kiqj ftys ds fuoklh crk, x, gSa] ftUgksaus ;g varj.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh gSA Dyse ;kfpdk dks vUrfjr fd, tkus ds dksbZ Bksl o fof/klEer vk/kkj izdV ugha fd, x, gSaA DysesaV&izkFkhZ dk ikyh esa O;kikj ;k fuokl djus dk dksbZ vfHkys[k izLrqr ugha djus ls gLrxr varj.k ;kfpdk dks dksbZ cy izkIr gksuk ugha dgk tk ldrk gSA /kkjk 166 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds rgr ikyh fLFkr vf/kdj.k dks DysesaV&izkFkhZ dh Dyse ;kfpdk dh lquokbZ dh vf/kdkfjrk izkIr gksuk n`f"Vxr gksrk gSA ;fn ,d {k.k ds fy;s ;kph&vizkFkhZx.k okgu pkyd o okgu Lokeh dks Dyse ;kfpdk dh lquokbZ dh

¶33

(4 of 4)

¶34

[CTA-105/2021]

¶35

{ks=kf/kdkfjrk ds laca/k esa dksbZ vkifRr gS] rks os ikyh fLFkr vf/kdj.k esa bl laca/k esa viuh vkifRr;ka izLrqr dj ldrs gSaA ysfdu /kkjk 24 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr ikyh fLFkr vf/kdj.k esa fopkjk/khu Dyse izkFkZuk i= dks ikyh ls tks/kiqj fcuk fdlh mfpr ,oa U;k;laxr vk/kkj ds vUrfjr fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶36

07ifj.kker% ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 24 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶37

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶38

Gaurav/-

¶39

;g vkns'[email protected]; Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348(i) ds rgr Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk jkti= la[;k 1] fnuakd 2 tuojh 1999 ,oa jktLFkku jkti= fnukafdr 10-3-1971 ds rgr fgUnh Hkk"kk ds iz;ksx dk s izkf/kd`r fd, tkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i fgUnh Hkk"kk esa fy[kk;k x;kA

Kailash v. Vijayraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash v. Vijayraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sawami Ramanad Saraswati Saket Seva Sami Vs Unknown

R.S.I.D.and I.C.Ltd Vs M/S Sohan Lal Pungalia and Anr.

Mangej Vs Champa Lal

R S R T C and Anr. Vs Smt. Gurvinder Kaur and Ors.

Kamla Devi Vs Sukhdev Swami Chela Shri Ramniwas Swami

Shyam Lal Gurjar Vs Secretary, Urban Improvement Trust