The High Court Bench at Jaipur granted permission to two sets of appellants to withdraw their second appeals under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC as the respondents had no objection. The appeals were subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeals allowed; both second appeals dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 565/2009
----Plaintiff-Appellants
Versus
----Defendants-Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 79/2010
----Plaintiff-Appellants
Versus
----defendant-Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Abhi Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rohit Choudhary, Dy.GC
(2 of 2)
[CSA-565/2009]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
21/07/2022
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SAURABH/89-90
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn with the leave of the court upon no objection from the respondent.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahbuddin S/o Ima Muddin and Moinuddin S/o Ima Muddin
State Of Rajasthan Through The District Collector, Dausa
Ima Muddin S/o Abdul Shakoor and Smt. Hurmat Nisha W/o Ima Muddin
State Of Rajasthan Through The District Collector, Dausa
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
