In a second appeal under Section 100 CPC regarding permanent injunction over alley width, the High Court dismissed the appeal finding no substantial question of law. The court held the first appeal was dismissed due to uncondonable delay and the matter was already conclusively adjudicated.
Second appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 343/2010
----Appellants-plaintiffs
Versus
----Respondents-defendants
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rahul Tiwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Kiran Mathur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Judgment
11/11/2022
(2 of 3)
[CSA-343/2010]
"वादी के वाद वासे साथायी ी नयी न िेषेधाध ा ज ी नवरुद्ध प्री निरुद्ध प्रतिवादी के सम्बन्ध ी के सम्बन्ध मद वादी के पक्ष ी के सम्बन्ध मदिरुद्ध प्रतिें तथा प्री निरुद्ध प्रतिवादी के ी नवरुद्ध इस आश्य कद्ध इस आश्य कीसाथायी ी नयी न िेषेधाध ा जारी कद्ध इस आश्य कीजािरुद्ध प्रतिी हहै कद्ध इस आश्य कीप्री निरुद्ध प्रतिवादी ी नविधषेध दारा सा स्था प िरुद्ध प्रतिप्रकरण के अी निरुद्ध प्रतिरक ी नकसी भ भिन्न ि र ुद्ध प्रतिीके से वादी कद्ध इस आश्य कीदीवार कार कोयी निहो नहींहं हटावे ी नयी निष्पक्ष अपयी निा ख अपना खरष स्वथाय्वयं वहयी निकरदेंगे। ी नयी निथायी के सम्बन्ध मायी नियमानुसार र डार ड िद्ध इस आश्य कीपर अपन ा खर बयी निाथ ा य जावे।"
(3 of 3)
[CSA-343/2010]
covers the grievance raised by plaintiffs. However, it appears that plaintiffs challenged this judgment and decree dated 23.2.2004 by way of first appeal but since first appeal was delayed without giving any sufficient cause, therefore, the first appeal was dismissed vide judgment dated 14.7.2010.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /87
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a substantial question of law arises when plaintiffs successfully obtained a permanent injunction decree but delay in first appeal precludes second appeal entertaiment.
Whether additional relief is available after the Gram Panchayat order affirmed by Revisional Authority and trial court decree protecting plaintiffs walls.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sube Singh
Meer Singh
Jeet Ram
Bhoop Singh
Smt. Tiddo
Leela Ram
SUDOSH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
