This order directs that identical writ petitions from two High Courts regarding additional fees admitting an advocate under uniform conditions be heard together and consolidated for hearing and disposal in the Jaipur Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Transfer Petition No. 21/2021
Birbal Gupta S/o Late Shri Vishveshwar Lal Gupta, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 8/347, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Joshi through V.C. For : Mr. Imran Khan, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
02/02/2022
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dks vUrj.k vkosnu ij lquk x;k RkFkk vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
U;k;ky; egkuxj eftLVªsV dze&31] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 1044@2018 esa fnukad 31-01-20 dks izlaKku vkns'k ikfjr fd;k Fkk] ftls orZeku ;kph@ifjoknh }kjk fuxjkuh ;kfpdk ds ek/;e ls pqukSrh nh x;h Fkh tks vkijkf/kd fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 240@20 chjcy cuke jktLFkku jkT; ds :i esa U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k dze&4] t;iqj egkuxj&izFke esa yafcr gSA blh izlaKku vkns'k dks vfHk;qDr lanhi lSuh vkfn ds }kjk fuxjkuh ;kfpdk esa pqukSrh nh x;h Fkh tks orZeku esa t;iqj
(2 of 2) [CRLTP-21/2021]
egkuxj&f}rh; U;k;{ks= ds v/khu lapkfyr U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&1] t;iqj egkuxj&f}rh; esa fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 17@20 ds :i esa yafcr gSA
pwafd mDr nksuksa gh ;kfpdkvksa dks ,d gh U;k;ky; esa vUrj.k ds fuosnu ds vuqdze esa ;g vUrj.k vkosnu is'k gqvk gS ,oa ,d gh vkns'k ds fo:) mDr nksuksa ;kfpdk,a vyx&vyx U;k;{ks= esa yafcr gS] tcfd U;k;fgr esa ,d gh U;k;ky; }kjk lquokbZ fd;k tkuk mfpr jgsxkA
vr% lEiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, v;kphx.k dks uksfVl tkjh fd;s fcuk gh ;kph dh fuxjkuh ;kfpdk t;iqj egkuxj&f}rh; U;k;{ks= esa vUrfjr fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
mijksDrkuqlkj ;g vUrj.k vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkdj U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k dze&4] t;iqj egkuxj&izFke ds le{k yafcr vkijkf/kd fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 240@20 chjcy cuke jktLFkku jkT; dks fof/k&vuqlkj lquokbZ vkSj fuLrkj.k gsrq U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&1] t;iqj egkuxj&f}rh; esa vUrfjr fd;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA
vUrfjrh U;k;ky; mijksDr vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vkxkeh rkjh[k is'kh ij nksuksa i{kksa esa ls tks Hkh mifLFkr gks] mUgsa lwfpr djrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 240@20 dks t;iqj egkuxj&f}rh; U;k;{ks= ds mijksDr U;k;ky; esa vUrfjr djsaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /34
1 issue framed by the court
Whether identical High Court orders under Article 226 admitting two different additional fees should be heard jointly.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Birbal Gupta
State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
