Allowed

Shyam Prakash Son of Shri Satya Narayan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Feb 2022CRLR/876/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Criminal Revision Petition challenging two acquittals was dismissed. The High Court held that since neither respondent was convicted by the lower court, there was no valid ground to impeach the finding of acquittal, rendering the petition not maintainable.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order admitting the Criminal Revision Petition was set aside; the petition was dismissed.

Shyam Prakash Son of Shri Satya… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 876/2021

¶3

Shyam Prakash Son Of Shri Satya Narayan, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Lava, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk (Rajasthan)

¶4

Ram Prakash Son Of Shri Satya Narayan, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Lava, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk (Rajasthan)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

Chhotu Lal Son Of Heera Lal Gurjar, Resident Of Jatawati, Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Gupta for Mr. Avadesh Kumar Purohit. For : Mr. Imran Khan, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

23/02/2022

¶14

;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ¼ftUgsa vkxs vfHk;qDrx.k dgk tk,xk½ dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; fo'ks"k U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼v-fu-½ izdj.k lokbZek/kksiqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la20@16 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 19-7-21 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh gS] ftlds ek/;e ls nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ds

¶15

(2 of 4) [CRLR-876/2021]

¶16

fo:) /kkjk 412 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksi esa vkjksi fojfpr djus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gSA

¶17

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd lg vfHk;qDr }kjk iqfyl fgjklr esa fd;s x;s dFku@nh x;h bRryk /kkjk 25 lk{; vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj lk{; esa xzkg; ugha gS] blds vykok vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr djus ckcr dksbZ lk{; i=koyh ij ugha gSA iwoZ esa Hkh mijksDr nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) fojfpr vkjksiksa dks ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk vikLr dj ekeyk izfrizsf"kr fd;k Fkk] ysfdu fQj Hkh fof/kd izko/kkuksa ij xkSj ugha dj vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;k tkdj vfHk;qDrx.k dks vkjksieqDr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k rF;ksa o lk{; ds vuq:i gksuk crkrs gq, iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

eSaus nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh o fof/kd fLFkfr dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

gLrxr ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd mUgksaus eq[; vfHk;qDrx.k ls MdSrh o pksjh ds ek/;e ls izkIr tsojkr dks rF;ksa dh tkudkjh gksrs gq, cnuh;friwoZd izkIr fd;kA bl laca/k esa ftu vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) MdSrh o pksjh dk vkjksi gS muds }kjk iwNrkN uksV esa ek= bruk gh dFku fd;k gS fd ,d lqukj dks dqN lkeku fodz; dj fn;k] ysfdu vpkud dqN fnu ckn vfHk;qDr jkeLo:i mQZ jk/ks';ke us iqfyl

¶21

(3 of 4) [CRLR-876/2021]

¶22

fgjklr esa jgrs gq, ;g bRryk nh fd dfM;ksa dks eSaus ykok esa jke ';ke lqukj dks csph Fkh tks ;gka ls utnhd gh gS] pkgs rks ml nqdku dks ykok esa crk ldrk gSA mijksDr laLohd`fr /kkjk 25 Hkkjrh; lk{; vf/kfu;e ds rgr xzkg; ugha gS vkSj lkfcr ugha dh tk ldrh gSA ,slh bRryk ds vuqlj.k esa dksbZ uohu rF; izdV gq, gS rks ek= ml lhek rd izdV rF; lqlaxr gks ldrs gSaA gLrxr vfHk;qDrx.k ls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gS] ,slk Lo;a iqfyl dk vkjksi i= esa mYys[k gSA

¶23

fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk Hkkjrh; lk{; vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 30 ds vk/kkj ij mijksDr laLohdfr dks lqlaxr ekuk gS ysfdu /kkjk 30 Hkkjrh; lk{; vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ls Li"V gS fd ;fn fdlh vfHk;qDr dk ,d gh izdj.k esa fopkj.k gks jgk gS vkSj mlds }kjk lkfcr dh x;h laLohdfr vfHkys[k ij miyC/k gks rks la;qDr :i ls mlh ekeys esa fopkfjr vfHk;qDr ds fo:) fopkj esa yh tk ldrh gS] /kkjk 30 lk{; vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj ;g izko/kku lkfcr laLohdfr ds laca/k esa gh ykxw gksrs gSa tcfd iqfyl vfHkj{kk ds nkSjku iqfyl ds le{k dh x;h laLohdfr uk rks lk{; esa xzkg; gS vkSj uk gh lkfcr gqbZ gS vkSj uk gh lkfcr gksus ;ksX; gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa bl laLohd`fr ds vk/kkj ij gLrxr vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr fd;k tkuk fof/kuqdwy ugha gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vU; dksbZ ys'kek= Hkh lk{; mijksDr vkjksiksa ds laca/k esa i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gSA

¶24

mijksDr foospu ls Li"V gS fd nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) mijksDr vijk/k esa vkjksi fojfpr djus ckcr dksbZ

¶25

(4 of 4) [CRLR-876/2021]

¶26

izFken`"V;k ekeyk ugha curk gS rFkk vkjksi fojfpr djus gsrq i=koyh ij dksbZ i;kZIr lkexzh ugha jgh gSA

¶27

vk{ksfir vkns'k rF;ksa fof/k ds foijhr o vfu;fer gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr gksus rFkk ;g nksuksa vfHk;qDRkx.k vkjksfir vijk/k ls mUeksfpr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶28

ifj.kker% iqujh{k.kdrkZ@';ke izdk'k o jke izdk'k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; fo'ks"k U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼v-fu-½ izdj.k lokbZek/kksiqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la- 20@16 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 19-721 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ';ke izdk'k o jke izdk'k dks /kkjk 412 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksi ls mUeksfpr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶29

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶30

Murari/73

Shyam Prakash Son of Shri Satya Narayan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Prakash Son of Shri Satya Narayan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umardeen Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Sachin Patil S/O Madhukar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ratiram S/O Shri Tullaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh Nagar S/O Shri Prahlad Nagar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sappi S/O Shri Rashid Alias Kana Vs State of Rajasthan

Harlal Gurjar S/O Shri Ghishalal Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan