Dismissed
Vakhta Ram v. State
Rajasthan HCCRLR/755/2002
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A criminal revision petition was dismissed because the petitioner had expired, causing the application to abate under the submission of the Public Prosecutor.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶2
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 755/2002
¶3
Vakhta Ram
¶4
----Petitioner
¶5
Versus
¶6
State
¶7
----Respondent
¶8
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Rajiv Bishnoli for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Vineet Jain,Sr. Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,PP |
¶9
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
¶10
Order
¶11
19/07/2022 Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner has expired.
¶12
The revision petition, thus, is dismissed as having abated. (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J. 48-Sanjay/-
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vakhta Ram
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Puspendra Singh Bhati
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/755/2002
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court