Disposed

Balwant @ Pintu @ Lucky Son of Shri Ramkuwar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Feb 2022CRLR/48/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, Jaipur, discharged the petitioner in criminal revision petition challenging premature bail refusal. Lacking a proper hearing on Section 164 CrPC grounds and no capable pleader present, the court held the accused was not duly represented and granted bail under Section 228 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's acquittal order made and pending bail petition disposed of favorably by granting bail.

Balwant @ Pintu @ Lucky Son of Shri Ramkuwar Vs… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 48/2022

¶3

Balwant @ Pintu @ Lucky Son Of Shri Ramkuwar, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Dagaro Ki Dhani, Tan Mamtori Khurd, Thana Manoharpur, District Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Prakash Yadav Mr. Sita Ram Yadav For : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP Respondent(s)

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

25/02/2022

¶12

;kph@vfHk;qDr ¼vkxs vfHk;qDr dgk tkosxk½ dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] pkSew ftyk&t;iqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 09@2020 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 17-11-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 363] 366 rFkk 376 Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi ls vkjksfir fd;k gSA

¶13

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd ihfMrk dk vigj.k@O;igj.k djus dk vkjksi /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa ugha gSA lEiw.kZ vfHk;kstu dgkuh feF;k gS] iqfyl }kjk vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ,d= lk+{; fojks/kkHkklh gSA

¶14

(2 of 3)

¶15

[CRLR-48/2022]

¶16

ihfMrk us vU; vfHk;qDrx.k dks fyIr djus dk iz;kl fd;k gS] ysfdu iqfyl us muds fo:) ekeyk ugha ekuk gS] ftlls Li"V gS fd ihfMrk ds dFku fo'oluh; ugha gSaA vr% ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkdj vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us i=koyh ij vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh gksus rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k fof/k&lEer gksuk crkrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

eSusa ijLij fojks/kh nyhyksa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶19

Sajjan Kumar Vs. CBI (2010) 9 SCC 368 & Kanti Bhadra Vs. State of West Bengal (2000) 1 SCC 722 esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ds vuqlkj vkjksi fojpu dh LVst ij lk{; dk lw{erk ls fo'ys"k.k] foospu rFkk mldh xq.koRrk ds vk/kkj ij nks"kfl)h vf/klEHkkO; gS vFkok ugha] bl fcUnq ij fopkj ugha fd;k tkuk gS] cfYd /kkjk 228 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vuqlkj vkjksi fojfpr djus gsrq ,oa vfHk;qDr }kjk mijksDr vijk/k dkfjr fd;k gS] bl ckcr~ mi/kkj.kk ds fy, jk; cukus gsrq ;fn i;kZIr lkexzh gS rks vkjksi fojfpr fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶20

blh izdkj Dinesh Tiwari Vs. St. of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. (2014) 13 SCC 137 ds ekeys esa /kkjk 228 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa dks ns[krs gq, ;g O;oLFkk nh x;h gS fd vkjksi fojfpr djrs le; fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk foLr`r ldkj.k vkns'k visf{kr ugha gSA

¶21

(3 of 3) [CRLR-48/2022]

¶22

gLrxr izdj.k esa ihfMrk ds llqj@ifjoknh us izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djk;h gS fd fnukad 25-04-20 dks vfHk;qDr cyoUrflag us lkFkh lqHkk"k ds lkFk mldh iq=o/kw vFkkZr ihfMrk dks cgyk&Qqlykdj ys x;kA ihfMrk us /kkjk 161 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa LosPNk cyoUr flag ds lkFk tkus dk dFku fd;k] ysfdu /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa tkfgj fd;k fd cyoUr flag us lqHkk"k ds ek/;e ls mldk vigj.k djk;k rFkk dksViqryh esa vfHk;qDr cyoUr flag us mlds lkFk cykRdkj fd;kA

¶23

bl izdkj vfHk;qDr ds fo:) mDr vkjksi fojfpr djus ds laca/k esa i;kZIr lkexzh i=koyh ij jgh gSA vr% fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ fof/kd] rF;kRed ,oa {ks=kf/kdkfjrk laca/kh =qfV nf'kZr ugha gksrh gS ,oa gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj izdV ugha gksrk gSA

¶24

ifj.kker% ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶25

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶26

Mittal /39

Balwant @ Pintu @ Lucky Son of Shri Ramkuwar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balwant @ Pintu @ Lucky Son of Shri Ramkuwar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harish Kumar Allias Pappu Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Balu Singh S/O Gangaram Sngh Vs State of Rajasthan

Prahlad Singh S/O Late Tej Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Paras S/O Shri Ganpatlal Balotiya Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Kumar S/O Late Shri Nathulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Meena S/O Shri Surendra Kumar Meena Vs State of Rajasthan