Single judge criminal revision petition where counsel sought permission to withdraw. The High Court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the revision accordingly. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
Permission to withdraw the criminal revision petition granted; revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 367/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Malwal for Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Laddha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
16/03/2022
Learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw
this criminal revision petition.
Permission, as sought for, is granted.
Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as having
withdrawn.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
CHHAYA AWASTHI /8
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission to withdraw the criminal revision petition should be granted.
Anil
Narendra
State Of Rajasthan
Rajendra Kumar Pareta
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
