Quashed

Kailash Chand Saini S/O Kesarlal B/C Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2022CRLR/233/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court set aside an order of the lower court which had discharged charges under Sections 279 and 304 of the IPC in a fatal accident case. The Court held that the discharge order was legally defective because it failed to cite specific legal precedents justifying the acquittal on the Section 304 charge. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration after hearing all parties and citing rel

What did the court decide?

The impugned discharge order under Sections 279 and 304 IPC is set aside. The trial court is directed to rehear the matter, hear all parties, cite relevant legal precedents, and pass a fresh appropria

Kailash Chand Saini S/O Kesarlal B/C Saini Vs… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 233/2020

¶3

Kailash Chand Saini S/o Kesarlal B/c Saini, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Malka Bhawan, Parasramnagar Dher Ka Balaji P.s. Murlipura Jaipur Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

Sunil Kumar Singhal S/o Mohan Lal Singhal, R/o P.n. 50 Mohan Nagar Nahargarh Road, Nahargarh, Jaipur City Raj.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Chouhan throuhg VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma PP Mr. Sobit Tiwari through VC

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

17/01/2022

¶13

vfHk;qDr@;kph ¼ftls vkxs vfHk;qDr dgk tk,xk½ ds }kjk ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vij ls”ku U;k;k/kh”k] dze&7] t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 2@20 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 20-1-2020 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 279] 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksi esa vkjksi fojfpr djus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gSA

¶14

(2 of 4) [CRLR-233/2020]

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr fo}ku vf/koDrk v;kph rFkk fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dks lquk x;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶16

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ,df=r lkexzh ds vuqlkj vf/kdre vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ykijokgh o mrkoysiu rkjhds ls okgu pykus dk vkjksi izFken"V;k izdV gq, gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dk vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa dksbZ lkexzh i=koyh ij ugha gS] vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;k tkosA vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n"Vkar izLrqr fd;s x;s gS%&

¶17

Prabhakaran Vs. State of Kerala, (2007) 14 SCC 269.

¶18

Naresh Giri Vs. State of M.P., (2008) 1 SCC 791.

¶19

P.M. Raju Vs. State of Kerala and Ors., Crl. A.No.1531 of 2008, decided on 26.02.2021.

¶20

Ravi Singh Vs. State of M.P., 2019 SCC Online MP 2478.

¶21

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk v;kph }kjk vk{ksfir vkns'k iw.kZr% fof/k lEer gksuk crkrs gq, rdZ fn;k fd vkjksi fojfpr djus gsrq ldkj.k foLr`r vkns'k dh vko';drk ugha gS] var esa iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k gSA

¶22

gLrxr ekeys esa ifjoknh lquhy dqekj fla?ky }kjk ntZ djkbZ xbZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj ;g vkjksi gS fd vfHk;qDr us fnukad 11-8-19 dks lqcg 4-00,-,e- ij viuh dkj

¶23

(3 of 4) [CRLR-233/2020]

¶24

dks rstxfr o ykijokgh ls pykrs gq, eksVjlkbZfdy ds VDdj ekjh ftlls eksVjlkbZfdy ij lokj ifjoknh ds Hkrhts oSHko dh ?kVukLFky ij eR;q gks x;h rFkk izTtoy ds pksVsa vkbZ ysfdu ckn esa mldh Hkh bykt ds nkSjku eR;q gks x;hA laiw.kZ vuqla/kku /kkjk 279 o 304&, Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ekeyk ekurs gq, fd;k x;k ysfdu vuqla/kku ds vafre izdze ij jkgqy o iwtk cSjok ds c;kuksa ds vk/kkj ij iqfyl us /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dk ekeyk izekf.kr ekers gq, /kkjk 279 o 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksi esa vkjksii= is'k fd;k vkSj mlh vuq:i fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls /kkjk 279 o 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksi esa vkjksi fojfpr djus dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA

¶25

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr pkjksa U;kf;d n"Vkarksa esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd tgka rd ykijokgh o mrkioysiu ls dksbZ nq?kZVuk dkfjr gqbZ gS rks /kkjk 304&, Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dk vkjksi fojfpr gksxk vFkok nks"kflf) jg ldrh gSA blds foijhr ;fn vfHk;qDr }kjk dksbZ dk;Z eR;q dkfjr djus ds vk'k; ls vFkok ,slh migfr dkfjr djus ds vk'k; ls ftlls eR;q gksuk laHkkO; gS vFkok bl Kku ds lkFk dksbZ dR; fd;k x;k gS ftlls fdlh dh eR;q gksus dh laHkkouk gS rFkk ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g dR; ;fn gR;k dh Js.kh esa ugha vkrh gS rks vkijkf/kd ekuoo/k dh Js.kh esa vk;sxkA

¶26

gLrxr ekeys esa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vk{ksfir vkns'k esa izFken"V;k ;g ekuk gS fd vfHk;qDr us okgu dks rstxfr o ykijokgh ls pykdj eksVjlkbZfdy ds VDdj ekjh ftlls oSHko o izTtoy ds pksVsa vkus ls eR;q gks x;h ysfdu blds foijhr /kkjk 279 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds

¶27

(4 of 4) [CRLR-233/2020]

¶28

lkFk /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dk vkjksi fojfpr djus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS tcfd vfHk;qDr dk ;g dR; /kkjk 299 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa of.kZr vk'k; vFkok Kku ds lkFk fd;k x;k gks vkSj mlds ifj.kkeLo:i eR;q dkfjr gqbZ gks] bl ckcr dksbZ izFken`"V;k fu"d"kZ ;k larks"k fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk ugha jgk gSA

¶29

;|fi vkjksi fojfpr djrs le; izR;sd ekeys esa ldkj.k foLrr vkns'k dh vko';drk ugha gS ysfdu gLrxr ekeys esa Li"V gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkns'k ijLij folaxfriw.kZ gS rFkk ,sls ekeys esa /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dk vkjksi fojfpr djus ckcr izFken"V;k D;k lkexzh jgh gS] mldk mYys[k gksuk vko';d Fkk rFkk mlds vHkko esa /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dk vkjksi fojfpr fd;k tkuk rF;kRed o fof/kd :i ls =qfViw.kZ gksus ls Lohdk;Z ugha gSA

¶30

mijksDr foospukuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj djrs gq, fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; } kjk vfHk;qDr dSyk'k pan ds fo:) /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa tks vkjksi fojfpr djus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gS] ml gn rd vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;g funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; lHkh i{kksa dks lqudj o i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh ds vk/kkj ij u;sfljs ls vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus ckcr fof/kuqlkj mfpr vkns'k ikfjr djsA

¶31

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶32

Murari Lal Sharma /10

Kailash Chand Saini S/O Kesarlal B/C Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Chand Saini S/O Kesarlal B/C Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Son of Shri Rohitashwa Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohsin Khan Son of Risal Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Tej Singh @ Tinku S/O Shri Brijraj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemraj S/O Lochan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Malik S/O Shri Ramphal Vs State of Rajasthan

Hazi Bundu S/O Shri Raibhan Khan Vs State of Rajasthan