In this criminal revision petition, the High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur disposed of the matter by ordering restitution under Section 138 of the BNSS.
petition allowed with notice and other consequential relief as per attached orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2088/2019
Mohan Singh Sankhla S/o Ram Pratap Sankhlal B/c Rajput, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Gunvata, Tehsil Amer, Distt. Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
Jagdish Prasad Meena S/o Jodhraj Meena B/c Meena, R/o Village Khora, Tehsil Amer, Distt. Jaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Samdaria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
16/09/2022
v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; vfrfjDr eq[; egkuxj eftLVªsV] dze&10] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k &52@2013 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 11-01-2019] ftlds rgr v;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 15]00]000@& :i;s dk vFkZn.M vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k &09@2019 v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k ¼lrh fuokj.k½ ,oa vij lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 22-04-2019 ls [kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
nksuksa i{kksa ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izdV fd;k x;k fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vijk/k esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA ewy jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC?k gS rFkk bl U;k;ky; ds iwoZ vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vknsf'kr dksLV dh jkf'k tek djk;s tkus ds i'pkr~ jftLVªkj ¼U;kf;d½ }kjk jkthukek lR;kfir fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-2088/2019]
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; o v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dze'k% fnukafdr 11-01-2019 ,oa 22-042019 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA lkFk gh] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= o vU; izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /98
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the complaint under Section 138 BNSS relating to bounced cheque.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohan Singh Sankhla
Jagdish Prasad Meena
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
