Revision petition disposed as parties resolved dispute amicably and petitioners withdrew continuation. Record ordered sent back.
Petition disposed; record sent back.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 14/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Suresh Kumbhat |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. H.S.Shrimali |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
16/12/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent development, the parties have resolved the
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-14/2018]
dispute amicably and therefore, the petitioners do not wish to continue the revision petition.
Shri H.S.Shrimali, learned counsel appearing for the respondents does not dispute this fact.
Hence, the revision petition is disposed of. Record be sent back forthwith.
(FARJAND ALI),J
176-RP/-
Smt. Teena Wife Of Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey
Ms. Rano Daughter Of Shri Vinod Kumar Pandey
Vinod Kumar Pandey
Chandrakanta Wife Of Shri Murli Manohar Pandey
Vijaylaxmi Wife Of Shri Rajendra
Rajendra Son Of Unknown
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
