Allowed

Aakash Kumar Brijawat Son of Om Prakash Brijawat v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jan 2022CRLR/1383/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against two petitioners accused under various IPC sections. The court held that there were no overt acts by the petitioners when incidents occurred and the remaining actions fell within the scope of the police case.

What did the court decide?

The First Information Report under Sections 408, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC and the criminal proceedings against the petitioners were quashed.

Aakash Kumar Brijawat Son of Om Prakash Brijawat Vs… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1383/2021

¶3

Aakash Kumar Brijawat Son Of Om Prakash Brijawat, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Raigar Mohalla, Bahrli, Bundi (Rajasthan)

¶4

Khushboo Brijawat Daughter Of Shri Om Prakash Brijawat, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Raigar Mohalla, Baharli Bundi Rajasthan

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmikant Malpura through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sher Singh Mehla, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

06/01/2022

¶13

;kphx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ¼vkxs vfHk;qDrx.k dgk tkosxk½ }kjk ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] cwanh }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 142@2016 muokuh jktLFkku jkT; cuke jfoizdk'k c`tkor oxSjg esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 01-09-21 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k x;h gS ftlds ek/;e ls vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk&lkFk orZeku ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks Hkh /kkjk 408] 409] 420] 467] 468] 471 rFkk 120ch Hkk-na-la- ds vkjksi ls vkjksfir fd;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd gLrxr izdj.k esa eq[; vkjksi nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ds HkkbZ jfoizdk'k ds fo:) gSA vfHk;qDr

¶15

(2 of 4)

¶16

[CRLR-1383/2021]

¶17

jfoizdk'k us ifjtu gksus ds ukrs fLFkfr dk nq:i;ksx djrs gq, orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k dh tkudkjh ds fcuk muds cSad cpr [kkrksa esa dksbZ jkf'k tek djok;h gS rks ek= bl vk/kkj ij mudks vkijkf/kd "kM;a= esa 'kkfey ugha ekuk tk ldrk gSA mUgksaus ;g Hkh rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDrk [kq'kcw rRle; vo;Ld Fkh] mls ?kVuk dh dksbZ tkudkjh ugha FkhA vkjksi fojfpr djus ckcr~ i=koyh ij dksbZ i;kZIr lkexzh ugha gS] vUr esa vk{ksfir vkns'k rF;ksa ,oa fof/k ds foijhr gksuk crkrs gq, vikLr djrs gq, nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k dks mUeksfpr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mijksDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, tkfgj fd;k fd vkijkf/kd "kM;a= ds laca/k esa izR;{k lk{; miyC/k gksuk okafNr ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd gLrxr ekeys esa nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ds cSad [kkrs esa Hkkjh ek=k esa jkf'k tek gqbZ gS vkSj muds }kjk vkgfjr Hkh dh x;h gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa bl vijk/k esa mudh lfdz; Hkwfedk jgh gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd ;fn vfHk;qDrx.k dk dksbZ cpko gS rks mls cpko lk{; esa izLrqr dj ldrs gSaA mUgksaus iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

eSaus nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA ftyk ifjoh{kk ,oa lekt dY;k.k vf/kdkjh] cwanh }kjk fnukad 14-02-14 dks vkj{kh dsUnz dksrokyh cwanh ij fyf[kr fjiksVZ izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd foHkkx ds }kjk Nk=ofRr forj.k dh tkrh gS] fcy ikfjr dj ykHkkfFkZ;ksa ds [kkrs esa jkf'k tek dh tkrh gSA jfo ctkor iq= vkseizdk'k lafonk ij foHkkx esa dEI;wVj vkWijsVj ds in ij dk;Zjr gS] ftlds }kjk fcy rS;kj dj dks"kky; esa Hkqxrku gsrq fHktok;s tkrs gSaA jfoizdk'k us nLrkostksa dh dwVjpuk djrs gq, Nk=o`fRr ds laca/k esa xyr fcy cukdj jktdks"k dh jkf'k vkgfjr dj vius ifjfprksa ds [kkrs esa tek djkdj xcu fd;k gSA

¶20

(3 of 4)

¶21

[CRLR-1383/2021]

¶22

bl fjiksVZ ls iwoZ ?kVuk dh tkudkjh feyus ij ftyk dyDVj] cwanh }kjk ,d desVh dk xBu fd;k x;k ftlds }kjk foLr`r tkap dh x;h ftlesa fofHkUu O;fDr;ksa ds cSad [kkrksa ds nLrkost izkIr fd;s x;sA rnuqlkj eq[; vfHk;qDr jfoizdk'k ds [kkrs eas 3]79]560@& :i;s dh jkf'k tek gqbZ gS rFkk jfoizdk'k ds HkkbZ vkdk'k ¼orZeku vfHk;qDr½ ds cSad [kkrs esa 5]36]817@& :i;s rFkk vfHk;qDrk [kq'kcw ds [kkrs esa 48]910@& :i;s dh jkf'k tek gqbZ gSA

¶23

vuqla/kku ds nkSjku tkap desVh ds lnL; Jh ujs'k dqekj ekyo] vfrfjDr ftyk eftLVªsV] rRdkyhu dks"kkf/kdkjh Jh jruyky vkfn us Hkh vius /kkjk 161 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa mijksDrkuqlkj eq[; vfHk;qDr jfoizdk'k ds }kjk jkf'k dwVjfpr nLrkostksa ds ek/;e ls xcu dj vius HkkbZ&cfgu o vU; O;fDr;ksa ds [kkrksa esa tek djkdj okfil izkIr djus dk dFku fd;k gSA cSad nLrkostksa ls Hkh mijksDr vkjksi izFken`"V;k izekf.kr gksrk gSA

¶24

fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk eq[; :i ls ;g rdZ jgk gS fd orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k vkdk'k rFkk [kq'kcw dks vius HkkbZ jfoizdk'k ds d`R; dh tkudkjh ugha Fkh] ysfdu bu nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k ds gLrk{kj ds fcuk jkf'k dk vkgj.k laHko ugha FkkA ;|fi vfHk;qDrk [kq'kcw ds [kkrs esa tek vkSj vkgfjr jkf'k rqyukRed :i ls de gS] ysfdu vfHk;qDr vkdk'k ds cSad [kkrs esa ikap yk[k :i;s ls vf/kd jkf'k vuqfpr :i ls tek gksdj okfil fudkyh x;h gsA nksuksa ,d gh ifjokjtu gSaA okLro esa orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k iw.kZr% funksZ"k gksrs rks mlh le; vkifRr dj ldrs FksA

¶25

vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus dh LVst ij izFken"V;k ekeyk ns[kuk gSA vkijkf/kd "kM;a= ds laca/k esa i{kdkjksa dk vkpj.k Hkh egRoiw.kZ gksrk gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds vkpj.k dks ns[krs gq, izFken"V;k mudk eq[; eq[;

¶26

(4 of 4)

¶27

[CRLR-1383/2021]

¶28

vfHk;qDr jfoizdk'k ds lkFk vkijkf/kd "kM;a= esa 'kkfey gksuk izdV gksrk gSA vkjksi dh LVst ij lk{; dk lw{erk ls fo'ys"k.k o foospu mfpr vkSj vuqer ugha gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr djus ckcr~ i;kZIr lkexzh i=koyh ij jgh gSA vk{ksfir vkns'k esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ fof/kd] rF;kRed =qfV vFkok vfu;ferrk ugha gSA mijksDr foospukuqlkj vk{ksfir vkns'k dks iq"V djrs gq, ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶29

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶30

Mittal /49

Aakash Kumar Brijawat Son of Om Prakash Brijawat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aakash Kumar Brijawat Son of Om Prakash Brijawat v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharamraj Son of Shri Bajranglal Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Kumar S/O Shri Anandi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sushila Saini W/O Late Shri Bhupendra Kumar Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhan Singh S/O Shri Shreelal Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaiveer Singh Son of Ram Swaroop Urf Raj Swaroop Vs CBI Branch

Nitin Sain Son of Shri Ratanlal Sain Vs Rahul Saini Son of Shri Jankilal