Allowed

Child in Conflict With Law S/O Ram Raj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Mar 2022CRLR/1342/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court, in a criminal revision petition, examined the procedural compliance regarding the production of a child in conflict with law before the Juvenile Justice Board. The court held that no legal irregularity or prejudice existed in the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Held no irregularity; confirmed bail approval; ordered production of child for hearing.

Child in Conflict With Law S/O Ram Raj Singh Vs… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1342/2021

¶3

Child In Conflict With Law S/o Ram Raj Singh, Aged About 17 Years, R/o Village Mundya, Tehsil Toda Bheem District Karauli At Present Tenant Of Rajesh Gurjar House No. 106, Indr Colony Hanuman City, Police Station Sanganer, Malpura Gate, District Jaipur Through His Natural Guardian Father Ram Raj Singh (At Present Confined At Children Observation Home Jaipur )

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashvardhan Nandwana for Mr. Rajesh Goswami. For : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP Respondent(s)

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

03/03/2022

¶12

fo}ku fd'kksj U;k; cksMZ] dze&1] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&493 @2021 iqfyl Fkkuk] ekyiqjk xsV] t;iqj iwoZ vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 363] 366&,] 376Mh , Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 3@4] 5 ¼th½@6 iksDlks ,DV rFkk /kkjk 3(1)(W)(I)(II) 3(2)(V) ,llh@,l Vh ,DV esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1 6-11-2021 ] ftlds rgr fd”kksj dk izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 12 fd'kksj U;k; ¼ckydksa dh ns[kjs[k ,oa laj{k.k½ vf/kfu;e] 2015 ¼ftls vkxs vf/kfu;e

¶13

(2 of 3) [CRLR-1342/2021]

¶14

2015 dgk tk,xk½ [kkfjt fd;k x;k ,oa fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky;] fof”k’V U;k;k/kh”k] ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e] 2012 ,oa deh'ku Qksj izksVD'ku vkWQ pkbYM jkbZVl ,DV] 2005 dze&3] t;iqj egkuxj] izFke }kjk QkStnkjh vihy la[;k&08 @2021 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 2411-2021 ds }kjk izLrqr vihy [kkfjt dh xbZ] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj mldh vksj ls tfj;s laj{kd ;g QkStnkjh iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk ¼tekur½ izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶15

cgl lquh xbZA fof/k ls la?k’kZjr fd”kksj ¼ftls vkxs fd”kksj dgk tk,xk½ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd fd”kksj funksZ’k gS] dkQh le; ls laEizs’k.k x`g esa gS] nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa dk vk{ksfir vkns”k fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gksdj vikLr gksus ;ksX; gS] fd”kksj dks ;fn tekur dh lqfo/kk nh xbZ rks og vius ekrk&firk@ifjokjtu ds laj{k.k esa vf/kd lqjf{kr jgdj viuk vuqdwy Hkfo’; fufeZr dj ldsxkA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vk{ksfir vkns”k vikLr djrs gq, tekur lqfo/kk iznku dh tk,A

¶16

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us nksuksa vk{ksfir vkns”kksa dks fof/kd izko/kkuksa dh eU”kk ds vuq:i gksuk crkrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns”k iq’V fd;s tkus rFkk ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

fof/kd izko/kkuksa rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lkexzh ij xEHkhjrk ls fopkj fd;kA vf/kfu;e 2015 dh /kkjk 12 ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj Li’V gS fd fd”kksj dh tekur ij fopkj djrs le; vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk lqlaxr ugha gS rFkk fd”kksj dk fgr gh loksZifj gSA

¶18

(3 of 3) [CRLR-1342/2021]

¶19

orZeku ekeys esa fd”kksj ij ;g vkjksi gS fd fd'kksj rFkk ,d vU; lg vfHk;qDr us 14 o’khZ; ckfydk dk Ldwy ls O;igj.k dj tcju eksVjlkbZfdy ij cSBkdj gksVy esa ys x;s] lg vfHk;qDr us ihfMrk ds lkFk tcju cykRdkj fd;k rFkk fd'kksj ckgj cSBk jgkA rRi'pkr fd'kksj o lg vfHk;qDr us ihfMrk dks okfil Ldwy NksM fn;kA

¶20

;|fi vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk ,sls ekeyksa esa lqlaxr ugha gS] ysfdu ftl eu% fLFkfr] ;kstuk o rS;kjh ds lkFk ;g xEHkhj vijk/k dkfjr djus dk vkjksi gS] mlls ;g bafxr gksrk gS fd fd”kksj ij mlds ekrk&firk ;k laj{kd dk dksbZ izHkkoh o xq.koRrkiw.kZ csgRrj ijofj”k dh rjQ okafNr /;ku ugha jgk gS vkSj bl fLFkfr esa ;fn fd”kksj dks tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkrk gS rks og iqu% Kkr] vKkr O;fDr;ksa ds lEidZ esa vk ldrk gSa vkSj mldk ekufld iVy foijhr :i ls izHkkfor gks ldrk gS] bl fLFkfr dks Hkh utjvankt ugha fd;k tk ldrk rFkk ;g fLFkfr fd”kksj ds fgrksa ds foijhr gksxhA

¶21

mijksDr foospukuqlkj Li’V gS fd nksuksa fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds vk{ksfir vkns”k esa dksbZ voS/kkfudrk ;k vfu;ferrk ugha gSA vk{ksfir vkns”k iq’V gksus rFkk ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk vLohdkj gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% fd”kksj dh vksj ls tfj;s laj{kd izLrqr ;g tekur iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 16-11-2021 o 24-11-2021 dh iqf’V dh tkrh gSA

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

Murari Lal Sharma /4

Child in Conflict With Law S/O Ram Raj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Child in Conflict With Law S/O Ram Raj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akhtar Ali S/O Dayam Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Mausam S/O Kannu Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijaypal Son of Man Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Gurjar S/O Shri Babulal B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas Vs Fateh Chand and Ors.

Manohar Singh Chahar S/O Jaalim Singh Vs State of Rajasthan