Remanded

Surendra@ Cheeku Son of Bharat Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Sept 2022CRLR/1145/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's bail application and remitting the matter, holding that the State failed to consider the petitioner's medical condition and lack of record evidence to justify continued remand.

What did the court decide?

Quashed the order of remand and rejected application; remanded matter for fresh consideration under Section 50D CrPC.

Surendra@ Cheeku Son of Bharat Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1145/2022

¶3

Surendra@ Cheeku Son Of Bharat Singh, Resident Of Village Mohanpur Post Doharkalan, Tehsil Narnaul District Mahendragarh (Haryana)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naina Ram Saran, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶9

Order

¶10

13/09/2022

¶11

;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] la[;k&2] cgjksM+ ftyk vyoj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k&13@2015 esa ikfjr vkns'k 21-02-2022 ls O;fFkr gksdj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ] ftlds ek/;e ls ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh gktjh ekQh dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj ugha fd;k tkdj mldh tekur tCr dh xbZ ,oa mls fxjQ~rkjh okjaV ls ryc fd;k x;kA

¶12

iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk foyEc ls izLrqr djus ds dkj.k foyEc dks {kE; fd;s tkus gsrq /kkjk&5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

lquk x;kA mDr izkFkZuk i= esa vafdr dkj.kksa o fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk fd, x;s fuosnu ds vk/kkj ij vafdr dkj.k mfpr ,oa i;kZIr gS rFkk mDr izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA ifj.kkeLo:i /kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dks vUnj e;kn ekuk tkrk gSA

¶14

[CRLR-1145/2022]

¶15

(2 of 3)

¶16

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr }kjk fuosnu fd;k x;k fd fnukad 21-02-2022 dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izdj.k c;ku eqyfte ds fy, yfEcr jgus ds nkSjku ;kph ds vf/koDrk us ;kph dh mifLFkfr ekQ djus ds fy, izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k FkkA mDr izkFkZuk i= esa ;kph dk vLoLFk gksuk ,oa t:jh dke gksuk vafdr fd;k x;k Fkk] ysfdu fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izkFkZuk i= esa vafdr rF;ksa ij fopkj ugha djrs gq, mDr izkFkZuk i= fujLr dj fn;k x;k o mldh tekur tCr djrs gq, mls fxjQrkjh okj a V ls ryc fd;k x;kA mudk fuosnu gS fd fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vk{ksfir vkns'k fof/kfo:) gS D;ksafd ml fnu okLro esa ;kph&vfHk;qDr vLoLFk Fkk rFkk bu rF;ksa ds leFkZu esa fpfdRlh; izek.k Hkh izLrqr fd;k FkkA vfHk;qDr dk vuqifLFkr gksus dk dkj.k lnHkkfod o ;qfDr;qDr Fkk] vr% iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk Lohdkj djus o v/khuLFk U;k;ky; } kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k dks vikLr fd, tkus dk fuosnu djrs gaSA

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶18

mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij fopkj fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;kA fnukad 21-02-2022 dks ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k ,d izkFkZuk i= mifLFkfr ls ekQh gsrq izLrqr fd;k Fkk] ftldh izekf.kr izfr bl ;kfpdk ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA bl izkFkZuk i= esa vuqifLFkfr dk dkj.k vfHk;qDr dk chekj gksuk ,oa t:jh dke gksuk vafdr fd;k x;kA izFke rks D;k chekjh Fkh] bldk dksbZ vadu ugha gS] f}rh; chekj gksus dk dksbZ izek.k Hkh izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k gS] lkFk gh D;k t:jh dke Fkk] bldks Hkh Li"V ugha fd;k x;k gSA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k bl izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa dksbZ fpfdRldh; nLrkost izLrqr fd;k x;k gks] ,slk izkFkZuk i= ls nf'kZr ugha gksrk gSA

¶19

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls i=koyh ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh vknsf'kdkvksa dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi;kWa izLrqr dh xbZ gSa] ftuds voyksdu ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa izdj.k ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds c;ku eqyfte esa fu;r FkkA lkFk gh dqN vfHk;qDrx.k U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa ,oa fiNyh dbZ isf'k;ksa ls

¶20

[CRLR-1145/2022]

¶21

(3 of 3)

¶22

;kph&vfHk;qDr vuqifLFkr py jgk FkkA izdj.k dkQh iqjkuk gksuk Hkh izdV gksrk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us mDr lHkh dkj.k nf'kZr djrs gq, izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj tekur tCr djus dk vkns'k fn;k gS] tks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa fdlh Hkh :i esa xyr] fof/k&fo:) ,oa vuqfpr ugha gS vkSj blesa gLr{ksi djus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ,oa vkSfpR; ugha gSA

¶23

ifj.kker% ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k

¶24

;kfpdk fujLr dh tkrh gSA

¶25

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶26

Pradeep Thawani/33

Surendra@ Cheeku Son of Bharat Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra@ Cheeku Son of Bharat Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harendra Singh S/O Shri Anandi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramdev S/O Shri Kajodmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Gita Devi D/O Late Sh. Bhagirath Kharra Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Singh S/O Balvir Singh Lora B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra@ Cheeku Son of Bharat Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Imtiyaj Son of Mumtaz Vs State of Rajasthan