Dismissed

Jaikishan v. State and Anr.

Rajasthan HC16 Aug 2022CRLMP/737/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Special Criminal Misc. petition challenging the framing of charges in the trial court was disposed of. Relying on Supreme Court precedent, the Court held no cause for interference at this stage, allowing the petitioner to raise legal issues later.

What did the court decide?

The petition and all pending applications were disposed of. The petitioner is allowed to take up legal issues before the trial court.

Jaikishan Vs State and Anr. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 737/2018

¶3

Jaikishan Son Of Reshma Ram, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Village Ekalkhori, Tehsil Osia, District Jodhpur Rural.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Rajasthan

¶7

Mohan Lal Son Of Jagram, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Kuka Village, Bagora Police Station, District Jalore, The Then/presently Posted As Programme Officer, Panchayat Samiri Osia, District Jodhpur Rural.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vinod Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Abhishek Purohit,AGA

¶10

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶11

Order

¶12

16/08/2022

¶13

This petition has been preferred, laying a challenge to order passed by learned trial court whereby charges have been framed against the petitioner.

¶14

At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor, while opposing the petition, relied upon the judgment of Sanghi Brothers (Indore) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Chaudhary & Ors , reported in 2009 Cr. L.J. 338, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that suspicion about commission of an offence and involvement of the accused is sufficient to frame charge.

¶15

Taking into consideration narrow scope of interference at this stage, the overall factual matrix as well as record of the case, no cause for making any interference is made out. However, the

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-737/2018]

¶17

petitioner shall be at liberty to take up all his legal issues, at the appropriate stage, before the learned trial court.

¶18

The present misc. petition stands disposed of accordingly. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

¶19

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

¶20

71-Jitender/nirmala

Jaikishan v. State and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaikishan v. State and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girdhari Ram Vs State

Piyush Dosi Vs State of Rajasthan

Roshan Vs State of Rajasthan

Kannaji and Anr. Vs State and Anr.

Smt Nani Bai @ Nannu Banoo and Anr. Vs State and Anr.

Vinod Singh and Ors. Vs State and Anr.