The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition for want of prosecution because the learned counsel for the parties failed to appear physically or through video conferencing despite the petition being pending since 2014.
Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 73/2014
Rajneesh Khandelwal S/o Shri Radheyshyam Khandelwal, R/o House No.9, Vasant Vihar, Krishan Nagar, Agra Road, Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Kankhedia, Public Prosecutor None for the complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA
Order
14/07/2022
Learned counsel for the parties neither appeared physically nor connected through video conferencing and the petition has been pending since 2014.
Hence, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Misc. application, if any, stands disposed.
(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J
Ashish Kumar /50
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution given the absence of counsel.
Rajneesh Khandelwal
State Of Rajasthan
Chandra Kumar Songara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
