Disposed

Chanderkala v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Mar 2022CRLMP/7176/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a miscellaneous petition seeking police protection for two individuals facing alleged threats from relatives regarding their marriage. No specific threat was pleaded. The Court directed the petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police with a representation if any apprehension arises, advising the police to consider and take necessary action. The disposal explicit

What did the court decide?

No immediate police protection granted; directed to submit representation to Superintendent of Police for consideration.

Chanderkala Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 7176/2021

¶3

Chanderkala W/o Chhotu Ram, Aged About 24 Years, D/o Shri Dhyan Chand, R/o Ward No. 9 , Chak D.l.p, Nathwana, Tehsil Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh (Raj.) And Presently Residing At Village 5 M.j.d., Nathwala, Tehsil Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh (Raj.)

¶4

Chhotu Ram S/o Shri Raja Ram, Aged About 24 Years, Village 5 M.j.d., Nathwala, Tehsil Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh Through Government Advocate, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶9

Station House Officer, P.s. Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh. (Raj.)

¶10

Dhyan Chand S/o Shri Nathu Ram, R/o Ward No. 9, Chak D.l.p. Nathwana, Tehsil Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶11

Ajay S/o Shri Dhyan Chand, R/o Ward No. 9, Chak D.l.p. Nathwana, Tehsil Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶12

Chandrapal S/o Shri Dhyan Chand, R/o Ward No. 9, Chak D.l.p. Nathwana, Tehsil Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)	: Mr. : Mr.	Himmat Jagga Vikram Sharma,PP

¶15

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶16

Order

¶17

04/03/2022

¶18

(2 of 3) [CRLMP-7176/2021]

¶19

The petitioners have preferred the present misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s).

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are of major age and they solemnized their marriage of their own free will. However, their family members are not agreeable to their marriage and have threatened them of dire consequences.

¶21

He prays that adequate police protection be provided to them.

¶22

Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded but considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move appropriate representation before the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh indicating their concern with the name(s) of probable assailants.

¶23

If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh shall consider the same and after analysing the factual situation pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident.

¶24

It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners’ marriage and proof of their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil

¶25

(3 of 3)

¶26

[CRLMP-7176/2021]

¶27

proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives.

¶28

With these observations, this criminal misc. petition is disposed of.

¶29

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶30

51-skm/-

Chanderkala v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chanderkala v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saraswati Vs State

Hardeep Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Peena Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghvendra Singh Gaur Vs State of Rajasthan

G.K. Construction Company Vs Balaji Makan Samagri Stores

Kanwar Raj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan