Dismissed

Brijesh Saini S/O Shri Dhoji Ram Saini, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Dec 2022CRLMP/7098/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses an application in S.C. Crl. Misc. No. 7098/2021 where the prosecution was absent. The court held that the lower court erred in conducting a mini trial and appreciating evidence, invoking the Supreme Court's guidance in State of U.P. v. Akhil Sharda.

What did the court decide?

The application is dismissed as it is not permissible to conduct a mini trial or pass an order while examining applications inter se regarding truthfulness of statements without presence of parties.

Brijesh Saini S/O Shri Dhoji Ram Saini, Vs State… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7098/2021

¶3

Brijesh Saini S/o Shri Dhoji Ram Saini, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Jothwara , Parshurampuriya School Ki Gali, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶7

Victim, Aged About 38 Years, R/o

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishan Sharma Mr. Ishwar Chand Sharma Mr. Pawan Sharma For : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Order

¶12

01/12/2022

¶13

;kph@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g ;kfpdk ifjokfn;k dh vksj ls iqfyl Fkkuk gjekMk] t;iqj if'pe esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 484@21 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 452] 376] 511 Hkk-na-la- dks fujLr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k dh gSA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd ifjokfn;k }kjk fnukad 06-04-21 dh ,d vU; ?kVuk crkrs gq, fnukad 06-0821 dks iqfyl Fkkuk gjekMk esa ,d ifjokn izLrqr fd;k Fkk ftlesa /kkjk 151 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr vfHk;qDr dks

¶15

(2 of 4) [CRLMP-7098/2021]

¶16

ikcan fd;k x;k Fkk ysfdu mlls larks"k ugha gksus ij ihfMrk }kjk fnukad 06-08-21 dh ?kVuk crkdj orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ feF;k vk/kkjksa ij ntZ djok;h x;h gS tks U;kf;d izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx gS] var esa ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vk{ksiksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo Li"V :i ls izdV gks jgs gSa rFkk lkjoku vuqla/kku gksuk 'ks"k gSA ;g vkjksi feF;k gksa] ,slk bl izdze ij fu"d"kZ ugha fudkyk tk ldrkA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr i{k dh vksj ls tks cpko fy;s x;s gSa] og vuqla/kku vFkok fopkj.k dk fo"k; gks ldrk gS] vUr esa ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶19

mijksDr of.kZr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ifjokfn;k }kjk fnukad 06-08-21 dh ?kVuk crkrs gq, ;g vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS fd vfHk;qDr us mlds ?kj esa vkdj tcju nq"deZ djus dk iz;kl fd;k rFkk blh vuq:i /kkjk 161 o 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFku jgs gSa vkSj iqfyl }kjk ckn vuqla/kku ekeyk izekf.kr ekurs gq, vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksi i= Hkh izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gSA

¶20

fnukad 06-04-21 dh ?kVuk ds laca/k esa izLrqr ifjokn fnukad 06-08-21 dks ntZ gqvk gS ysfdu ;g iqfyl esa dc izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ;g Li"V ugha gqvk gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vkjksiksa ds vk/kkj ij vfHk;qDr ds fo:) laKs;

¶21

(3 of 4)

¶22

[CRLMP-7098/2021]

¶23

vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gksa bl LVst ij bu vkjksiksa dh lR;rk@vlR;rk vkfn ds laca/k esa fopkj fd;s fcuk dksbZ fu"d"kZ ugha fn;k tk ldrkA vfHk;qDr i{k dh vksj ls bl izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vkjksiksa dks ftu vk/kkjksa ij feF;k crkus dk iz;kl fd;k gS] os vuqla/kku vFkok vfHk;kstu lafLFkr gksus ij cpko dk fo"k; gks ldrs gSaA

¶24

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk 2022 SCC OnLine SC 820 State of Uttar Pradesh and Anrs. Vs. Akhil Sharda and Ors with Sanjeet Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. ds iSjk la[;k*07 esa ;g fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS%&

¶25

"7.Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered."

¶26

mijksDrkuqlkj Li"V gS fd /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, bl LVst ij miyC/k lkexzh dh lR;rk] fo'oluh;rk vFkok Lohdk;Zrk ds

¶27

(4 of 4) [CRLMP-7098/2021]

¶28

laca/k esa laf{kIr tkap vFkok fopkj.k vuqKs; ugha gSA tc rd lqn`< vk/kkj ugha gksa] rc rd vuqla/kku izfdz;k dks jksdk tkuk vFkok ckf/kr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA

¶29

bl izdkj izdj.k fof'k"V dh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr {ks=kf/kdkfjrk dk iz;ksx gLrxr ekeys esa fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gS vkSj izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶31

bl vkns'k esa tks Hkh vfHker izdV fd;k x;k gS og bl vkosnu ds fuLrkj.k dh lhek rd lqlaxr gS rFkk fopkj.k gksus dh fLFkfr esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; blls izHkkfor gq, fcuk fof/kuqlkj fopkj.k gsrq vxzlj gksxkA

¶32

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶33

Murari/2

Brijesh Saini S/O Shri Dhoji Ram Saini, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijesh Saini S/O Shri Dhoji Ram Saini, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Meenakshi Sharma W/O Shri Sunil Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Beena Devi W/O Chhuttan Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Anju Meena Wife of Shri Rahul Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan

Aashish Bindal S/O Shri Damodar Bindal, Vs Minakshi Bindal W/O Aashish Bindal

Anil Aggarwal S/O Jaganath Aggarwal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Singh Rawat S/O Shri Biram Singh Rawat, Vs Suresh Chand Chauhan S/O Shri Yashodanand Chauhan