Partly allowed

M.M.Sharma Son of Banshidhar v. Chitarlal Son of Heeralal

Rajasthan HC22 Nov 2022CRLMP/6977/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted 15 extra days to appear for the bail application originally scheduled on February 21, 2022, beyond the statutory 30-day limit. The extension was justified by the petitioner's age of 71 and inadequate physical condition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted 15 days additional time to appear for bail application scheduled for 21-02-2022.

M.M.Sharma Son of Banshidhar Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6977/2022

¶3

M.M.sharma Son Of Banshidhar, Resident Of House Number 96, Vallabhbadi, Police Station Gumanpura Kota (Raj).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Chitarlal Son Of Heeralal, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of 6-A-27, Mahaveer Nagar Third, Kota (Raj).

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudarshan Kumar Laddha For : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP Respondent(s)

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

22/11/2022

¶12

;kph@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g ;kfpdk fof'k"V U;kf;d eftLVªsV ¼,uvkbZ,DV izdj.k½ la[;k&2] dksVk }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 4143@14 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 14-01-2022 ds ek/;e ls ;kph@vfHk;qDr dks nks"kfl) dj nafMr fd;k ftlesa vihyh; U;k;ky; vfrfjDr ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k efgyk mRihMu izdj.k dze&1] dksVk }kjk QkStnkjh vihy la[;k 10@2022 eas ikfjr vkns'k vkns'k fnukad 21-02-2022 ds ek/;e ls vU; 'krksZa ds lkFk 60 fnu dh vof/k esa 27]800@& :i;s tek djkus dh

¶13

[CRLMP-6977/2022]

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

'krZ ij n.Mkns'k LFkfxr fd;k Fkk] ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gSA

¶16

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr 71 o"kZ dk O;fDr gS ,oa foijhr vkfFkZd ifjfLFkfr;kas ds dkj.k 60 fnol esa mijksDr vkns'k dh ikyuk ugha dj ldk] vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 21-02-2022 dh ikyuk gsrq vkt ls 15 fnu dk le; foLrkj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶17

/kkjk 148 ,uvkbZ,DV ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj mijksDr vkns'k dh ikyuk 60 fnu esa rFkk vf/kdre 30 fnu dh le;kof/k foLrkfjr fd;s tkus ij vkns'k dh ikyuk dk izko/kku gS] ysfdu /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr iznRr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs gq, 5000@& :i;s dh dksLV ij ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶18

rnuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj dj vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 21-02-2022 dh ikyuk esa jkf'k tek djkus gsrq vkt ls 15 fnu dk le; foLrkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶19

mDr 5000@& :i;s dh dksLV fof/kd lgk;rk dks"k] dksVk ds le{k vkt ls 10 fnu ds vUnj tek djkuh gksxhA fu;r vof/k esa mijksDr dksLV jkf'k tek ugha gksus dh fLFkfr esa ;g ;kfpdk [kkfjt le>h tkosxhA vkns'k fnukad 21-02-2022 dh 'ks"k 'krsZa ;Fkkor jgsaxhA

¶20

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶21

Mittal /161

M.M.Sharma Son of Banshidhar v. Chitarlal Son of Heeralal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.M.Sharma Son of Banshidhar v. Chitarlal Son of Heeralal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rambu Mali Son of Shri Mangilal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Shakir Son of Shri Rehmat Khan, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Kumar S/O Shri Narayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajesh Jain S/O Shri Sumati Prakash Jain, Vs State of Rajasthan

Nawal Kishor Dangayach S/O Shri Jugal Kishor Vs State of Rajasthan

Laxmikant Koli S/O Shri Devichand Koli Vs State of Rajasthan