Dismissed

Kiran Deep Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Aug 2022CRLMP/5063/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On behalf of a couple facing threats from relatives regarding their live-in-relationship, the High Court granted interim police protection upon directing petitioners to submit a representation detailing specific threats. The court clarified that this order did not validate their relationship or ages.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to move representation to Superintendent of Police detailing threats; Court clarified no validation of relationship or age.

Kiran Deep Kaur Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5063/2022

¶3

Kiran Deep Kaur D/o Sukhjeet Singh, Aged About 19 Years, B/c Majbi Sikh, R/o Ward No. 04, 38-F, 2Mm, Dharinganwali, Sri Ganganagar.

¶4

Bajrang S/o Mehar Chand, Aged About 21 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Shayamgarh, P.s. Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department Of Home Affairs Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Sri Ganganagar. 3. The Sho, Police Station Sri Karanpur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶9

Iqbal Singh S/o Sukhjeet Singh, R/o Ward No. 04, 38-F, 2Mm, Dharinganwali, Sri Ganganagar.

¶10

Yash S/o Sukhjeet Singh, R/o Ward No. 04, 38-F, 2Mm, Dharinganwali, Sri Ganganagar.

¶11

Mandeep Singh S/o Sanga Singh, R/o Ward No. 04, 38-F, 2Mm, Dharinganwali, Sri Ganganagar.

¶12

Pola Singh S/o Sanga Singh, R/o Ward No. 04, 38-F, 2Mm, Dharinganwali, Sri Ganganagar.

¶13

Mikka Singh S/o Manga Singh, R/o Ratewale, P.s. Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present

¶16

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶17

Order

¶18

08/08/2022

¶19

The petitioners have preferred the present misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to

¶20

(2 of 3)

¶21

[CRLMP-5063/2022]

¶22

the respondent authorities to provide adequate security and protection to them, as they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s).

¶23

It is stated in the petition that the petitioners are above 18 years of age and are in a live-in-relationship. But such relationship is not acceptable to their family members/society and they have threatened them of dire consequences. 3. It has been prayed that adequate police protection be provided to them. 4. Though no specific instance or imminent threat has been pleaded but considering the prayer made by the petitioners in the petition and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that if the petitioners are having any apprehension or threat perception about their life and liberty from their relatives, they may move appropriate representation before the Superintendent of Police, Sri Ganganagar indicating their concern with the name(s) of probable assailants.

¶24

If any such representation is moved by the petitioners, the Superintendent of Police, Sri Ganganagar shall consider the same and after analysing the factual situation pass necessary orders or take action to ward off any untoward incident.

¶25

It is hereby clarified that this order may not be construed to be a validation of petitioners’ live-in-relationship and proof of their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at the instance of their relatives.

¶26

(3 of 3)

¶27

[CRLMP-5063/2022]

¶28

With these observations, this criminal misc. petition is

¶29

disposed of.

¶30

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶31

94-A.Arora/-

Kiran Deep Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Deep Kaur v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Guraditta Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Lata Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemant Meghawat Vs State

Bina Devi Vs M/S. Priyanka Textiles

Kanhaiya Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pooja Vs State of Rajasthan