Dismissed

Bharta Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Apr 2022CRLMP/501/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the petition for quashment of FIR. The petitioner was directed to join the investigation and submit a bank statement to the Investigating Officer. If a cognizable offence is made out, a notice will be issued as required by law.

What did the court decide?

The petition and stay petition were dismissed. The petitioner was directed to join investigation and submit bank statement details.

Bharta Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2022)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 501/2022

¶4

Bharta Ram S/o Sh. Hari Singh, Aged About 41 Years, Bhani Bhadra, Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

Bharat Bhushan Sharma S/o Purnchandra Sharma, R/o 8/113, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur, At Present Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Bhadra, Dist. Hanumangarh.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Moti Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.K. Bhati,PP

¶11

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶12

Order

¶13

04/04/2022

¶14

The present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner for quashment of FIR No.108/2018, vide which allegations under Sections 408, 420, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, have been levelled against the petitioner.

¶15

Having regard to the allegations made in the FIR, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to join the investigation.

¶16

The petitioner may file a representation along with photostat copy of the bank statement of concerned account before the Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same in accordance with law.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMP-501/2022]

¶19

In case the Investigating Officer comes to the conclusion that a cognizable offence is made out against the petitioner, he shall issue a notice to the petitioner as required under Section 41-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 5. The criminal misc. petition so also stay petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶20

Needless to observe that the petitioner’s remedy for taking appropriate action shall stand reserved.

¶21

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶22

178-skm/-

Bharta Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharta Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Poonam Vs State of Rajasthan

Makhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Lehri Lal Suthar Vs State of Rajasthan

Prabhu Vs State of Rajasthan

Mayank Kumar Devedi Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhanwar Lal Vs State