Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR as vindictive under Section 482 CrPC. The petition was withdrawn with liberty to defend via representation to the Investigating Officer. A co-stay application was disposed of.
Permission granted to withdraw petition with liberty to file representation with evidence to IO.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4789/2022
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ratana Ram For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mool Singh Bhati, PP
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
26/08/2022
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-4789/2022]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
168-pooja/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to quash the FIR registered against the petitioners.
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioners to file a representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devi Lal Kalal
Shanti Devi
State Of Rajasthan
Babu Lal
Dinesh Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
